TMFC vs. MFVL
TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index, while MFVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. TMFC is passively managed, while MFVL is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
TMFC vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's 0.39% return.
TMFC
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 26.20%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL
- 1D
- -1.06%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 0.39%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMFC vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 8.44% | -0.32% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.39% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFC and MFVL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFC vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank
TMFC
MFVL
TMFC vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFC | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFC | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.31 | +0.52 |
Drawdowns
TMFC vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and MFVL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFC | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -7.03% | -26.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -3.29% | +2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -2.42% | -4.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | — | — |
Volatility
TMFC vs. MFVL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFC | MFVL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 12.15% | +1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 12.15% | +8.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 12.15% | +9.84% |
TMFC vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TMFC and MFVL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
TMFC vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison
TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFC and MFVL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMFC and MFVL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
TMFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
TMFC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MFVL is Large Cap Value Equities.
Find the right allocation for TMFC and MFVL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer