TMFC vs. MFVL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) and MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index, while MFVL is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Motley Fool. TMFC is passively managed, while MFVL is actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.

Performance

TMFC vs. MFVL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a 4.22% return, which is significantly higher than MFVL's -1.85% return.

TMFC

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -3.48%
• YTD: 4.22%
• 6M: 2.97%
• 1Y: 18.73%
• 3Y*: 23.53%
• 5Y*: 14.07%
• 10Y*: —

MFVL

• 1D: 0.56%
• 1M: -2.10%
• YTD: -1.85%
• 6M: -2.69%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMFC vs. MFVL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	4.22%	-0.42%
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	-1.85%	1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TMFC and MFVL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025	0.50

Return for Risk

TMFC vs. MFVL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFC

TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 38
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 39
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 37

MFVL

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFC vs. MFVL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TMFC	MFVL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.85	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.36	—	—

Drawdowns

TMFC vs. MFVL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, which is greater than MFVL's maximum drawdown of -7.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and MFVL.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMFC	MFVL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.06%	-7.03%	-26.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.06%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.96%	-5.44%	+0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.75%	-2.62%	-4.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TMFC	MFVL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.43%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.22%	12.12%	+2.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.48%	12.12%	+8.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.99%	12.12%	+9.87%

TMFC vs. MFVL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TMFC and MFVL have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

Dividends

TMFC vs. MFVL - Dividend Comparison

TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, while MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF	0.14%	0.14%	0.40%	0.26%	0.27%	0.23%	0.42%	0.50%	0.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMFC and MFVL in my portfolio?

TMFC and MFVL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TMFC or MFVL?

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMFC or MFVL?

TMFC and MFVL have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMFC or MFVL?

TMFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.

What is the main difference between TMFC and MFVL?

TMFC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while MFVL is Large Cap Value Equities.