PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MFVL vs. MFIG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MFVL vs. MFIG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a -3.12% return, which is significantly lower than MFIG's 0.49% return.


MFVL

1D
-0.73%
1M
-3.38%
YTD
-3.12%
6M
-3.51%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MFIG

1D
-1.38%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
0.49%
6M
-0.92%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MFVL vs. MFIG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between MFVL and MFIG is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025

0.63

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MFVL vs. MFIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Motley Fool Innovative Growth Factor ETF (MFIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MFVL vs. MFIG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MFVL vs. MFIG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum MFIG drawdown of -14.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and MFIG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MFVLMFIGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.03%

-14.29%

+7.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.67%

-5.73%

-0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.57%

-4.59%

+2.02%

Volatility

MFVL vs. MFIG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MFVLMFIGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.15%

17.12%

-4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.15%

17.12%

-4.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.15%

17.12%

-4.97%

MFVL vs. MFIG - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both MFVL and MFIG have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

MFVL vs. MFIG - Dividend Comparison

Neither MFVL nor MFIG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


MFVL and MFIG have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MFVL and MFIG have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

MFVL and MFIG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

MFVL is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while MFIG is Large Cap Growth Equities.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MFVL and MFIG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer