PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TMFC vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TMFC vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TMFC vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
-8.08%19.55%35.17%47.04%-30.86%25.30%5.46%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
-5.92%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a -8.08% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's -5.92% return.


TMFC

1D
2.97%
1M
-4.93%
YTD
-8.08%
6M
-6.33%
1Y
18.78%
3Y*
23.36%
5Y*
13.08%
10Y*

QQQM

1D
3.37%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
-5.92%
6M
-3.59%
1Y
23.76%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
12.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TMFC vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMFC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TMFC vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMFC
TMFC Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TMFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TMFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
TMFC Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
TMFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
TMFC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMFC vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TMFCQQQMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.06

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.47

1.65

-0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.89

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.42

6.96

-1.54

TMFC vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMFC Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMFC and QQQM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TMFCQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.06

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.59

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.63

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between TMFC and QQQM is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TMFC vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than QQQM's 0.53% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
TMFC
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF
0.16%0.14%0.40%0.26%0.27%0.23%0.42%0.50%0.61%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.53%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TMFC vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and QQQM.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TMFCQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.06%

-35.04%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

-12.55%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.06%

-35.04%

+1.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.95%

-8.99%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.88%

-8.47%

+1.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

3.41%

+0.13%

Volatility

TMFC vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) is 5.76%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that TMFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TMFCQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.76%

6.48%

-0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.52%

12.73%

-2.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.21%

22.42%

-2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

22.25%

-1.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.14%

22.27%

-0.13%