MFVL vs. CAMX
MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and CAMX (Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for CAMX.
Performance
MFVL vs. CAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a 1.07% return, which is significantly lower than CAMX's 9.82% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- 0.68%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- YTD
- 1.07%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAMX
- 1D
- 1.13%
- 1M
- 2.62%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 9.23%
- 1Y
- 15.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.50%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MFVL vs. CAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.39% |
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | 9.82% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and CAMX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. CAMX — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
CAMX
MFVL vs. CAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF (CAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| MFVL | CAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.16 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.88 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. CAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum CAMX drawdown of -15.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and CAMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | CAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -15.71% | +8.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -11.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.63% | 0.00% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.42% | -2.76% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. CAMX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | CAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.50% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 13.82% | -1.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 14.45% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 14.45% | -2.31% |
MFVL vs. CAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than CAMX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFVL vs. CAMX - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAMX Cambiar Aggressive Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.81% | 1.33% | 0.55% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFVL and CAMX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CAMX.
CAMX has the higher dividend yield at 1.65%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Cambiar Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.59% for CAMX.
Find the right allocation for MFVL and CAMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer