MFVL vs. DEW
MFVL (Motley Fool Value Factor ETF) and DEW (WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. MFVL is actively managed, while DEW is passively managed. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MFVL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DEW.
Performance
MFVL vs. DEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFVL achieves a -2.40% return, which is significantly lower than DEW's 12.97% return.
MFVL
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -2.65%
- YTD
- -2.40%
- 6M
- -2.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DEW
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- -0.07%
- YTD
- 12.97%
- 6M
- 12.77%
- 1Y
- 25.61%
- 3Y*
- 19.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
MFVL vs. DEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | -2.40% | 1.22% |
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 12.97% | 1.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFVL and DEW is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2025 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFVL vs. DEW — Risk / Return Rank
MFVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DEW
MFVL vs. DEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool Value Factor ETF (MFVL) and WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund (DEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFVL | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.47 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.06 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 15.88 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFVL vs. DEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFVL drawdown since its inception was -7.03%, smaller than the maximum DEW drawdown of -65.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFVL and DEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFVL | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.03% | -65.55% | +58.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.34% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.86% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.97% | -1.12% | -4.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.60% | -12.41% | +9.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
MFVL vs. DEW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFVL | DEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.35% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 9.76% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 12.98% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 15.42% | -3.28% |
MFVL vs. DEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
MFVL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than DEW's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
MFVL vs. DEW - Dividend Comparison
MFVL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DEW WisdomTree Global High Dividend Fund | 3.18% | 3.71% | 4.02% | 4.55% | 3.82% | 3.55% | 4.10% | 3.74% | 4.17% | 3.18% | 3.42% | 4.32% |
MFVL Motley Fool Value Factor ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFVL and DEW have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MFVL is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MFVL is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DEW.
DEW has the higher dividend yield at 3.18%, compared with 0.00% for MFVL.
They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for MFVL and 0.58% for DEW.
Find the right allocation for MFVL and DEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer