TMFC vs. TMFX
TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) and TMFX (Motley Fool Next Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index, while TMFX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool Next Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TMFC returned 25.23%/yr vs 14.65%/yr for TMFX. Their 0.78 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. Both charge a 0.50% expense ratio.
Performance
TMFC vs. TMFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a 11.26% return, which is significantly higher than TMFX's 10.60% return.
TMFC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 3.30%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 1Y
- 22.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.23%
- 5Y*
- 14.48%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.11%
TMFX
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- 1.83%
- 6M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 14.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.91%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $7.58M | $6.48M | $6.42M | |
| $122.33K | $111.32K | $114.96K |
TMFC vs. TMFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 11.26% | 19.55% | 35.17% | 47.04% | -30.86% | -0.72% |
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 10.60% | 10.41% | 16.04% | 17.95% | -28.16% | -0.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFC and TMFX is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between TMFC and TMFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFC vs. TMFX — Risk / Return Rank
TMFC
TMFX
TMFC vs. TMFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMFC | TMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.05 | +0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.06 | 3.30 | +2.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMFC vs. TMFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, roughly equal to the maximum TMFX drawdown of -34.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and TMFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFC | TMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -34.72% | +1.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.64% | -13.95% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.06% | -24.05% | +3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | -0.62% | +0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.69% | -14.22% | +7.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 4.41% | -0.77% |
Volatility
TMFC vs. TMFX - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Motley Fool Next Index ETF (TMFX) have volatilities of 4.97% and 5.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFC | TMFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.97% | 5.04% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.87% | 13.21% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.80% | 17.44% | -2.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.57% | 23.19% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 23.19% | -1.27% |
TMFC vs. TMFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TMFC and TMFX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.
Dividends
TMFC vs. TMFX - Dividend Comparison
TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, more than TMFX's 0.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% |
TMFX Motley Fool Next Index ETF | 0.05% | 0.05% | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFC and TMFX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to TMFC (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFC dropped -33.06% vs TMFX's -34.72%.
On 3-year performance, TMFC leads with 25.23% vs 14.65% for TMFX. Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TMFC has performed better with a 25.23% return vs 14.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMFC and TMFX have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.
TMFC has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.05% for TMFX.
TMFC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while TMFX is Mid Cap Growth Equities. TMFC tracks Motley Fool 100 Index, while TMFX tracks Motley Fool Next Index.
TMFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFC and TMFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer