TMFC vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
TMFC and SCHG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TMFC is a passively managed fund by Motley Fool that tracks the performance of the Motley Fool 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 29, 2018. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009. Both TMFC and SCHG are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TMFC or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between TMFC and SCHG is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TMFC vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TMFC:
2.14
SCHG:
2.01
TMFC:
2.83
SCHG:
2.62
TMFC:
1.38
SCHG:
1.36
TMFC:
3.09
SCHG:
2.90
TMFC:
12.44
SCHG:
11.05
TMFC:
2.81%
SCHG:
3.24%
TMFC:
16.27%
SCHG:
17.85%
TMFC:
-33.06%
SCHG:
-34.59%
TMFC:
-2.21%
SCHG:
-2.16%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a 1.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 2.15% return.
TMFC
1.43%
0.56%
12.14%
32.72%
18.73%
N/A
SCHG
2.15%
0.60%
11.86%
33.25%
19.12%
16.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TMFC vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TMFC vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TMFC
SCHG
TMFC vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TMFC vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, more than SCHG's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.40% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
TMFC vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TMFC vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) is 6.10%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that TMFC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.