TMFC vs. HERD
TMFC (Motley Fool 100 Index ETF) and HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TMFC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Motley Fool 100 Index, while HERD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMFC returned 15.96%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for HERD. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TMFC charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for HERD.
Performance
TMFC vs. HERD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMFC achieves a 8.44% return, which is significantly lower than HERD's 12.05% return.
TMFC
- 1D
- -0.85%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- YTD
- 8.44%
- 6M
- 8.14%
- 1Y
- 25.76%
- 3Y*
- 26.20%
- 5Y*
- 15.96%
- 10Y*
- —
HERD
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 3.45%
- YTD
- 12.05%
- 6M
- 12.85%
- 1Y
- 29.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.33%
- 5Y*
- 9.95%
- 10Y*
- —
TMFC vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 8.44% | 19.55% | 35.17% | 47.04% | -30.86% | 25.30% | 42.00% | 13.97% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 12.05% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 7.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMFC and HERD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.49 |
The correlation between TMFC and HERD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
TMFC vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TMFC
HERD
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
TMFC
HERD
Communication Services
TMFC
HERD
Financial Services
TMFC
HERD
Consumer Cyclical
TMFC
HERD
Healthcare
TMFC
HERD
Consumer Defensive
TMFC
HERD
Industrials
TMFC
HERD
Energy
TMFC
HERD
Real Estate
TMFC
HERD
Basic Materials
TMFC
HERD
Utilities
TMFC
HERD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMFC vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank
TMFC
HERD
TMFC vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TMFC | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.45 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.05 | 5.19 | -3.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.63 | 17.73 | -10.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TMFC | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.54 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 | 0.56 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.63 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
TMFC vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMFC drawdown since its inception was -33.06%, smaller than the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMFC and HERD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMFC | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.06% | -39.41% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.64% | -5.68% | -6.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.06% | -18.90% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.06% | -21.60% | -11.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | -0.67% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -4.55% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.39% | 1.66% | +1.73% |
Volatility
TMFC vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison
Motley Fool 100 Index ETF (TMFC) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) at 2.92%. This indicates that TMFC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HERD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMFC | HERD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 2.92% | +0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 7.74% | +2.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.52% | 11.62% | +1.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.37% | 17.76% | +2.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 20.50% | +1.49% |
TMFC vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TMFC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
TMFC vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison
TMFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than HERD's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 3.13% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% |
TMFC Motley Fool 100 Index ETF | 0.13% | 0.14% | 0.40% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.23% | 0.42% | 0.50% | 0.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMFC and HERD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TMFC has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to HERD (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMFC dropped -33.06% vs HERD's -39.41%.
On 5-year performance, TMFC leads with 15.96% vs 9.95% for HERD. On fees, TMFC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 2.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, TMFC has performed better with a 15.96% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TMFC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 0.13% for TMFC.
TMFC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while HERD is Global Equities. TMFC tracks Motley Fool 100 Index, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. They also come from different issuers: Motley Fool and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for TMFC and 0.73% for HERD.
HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMFC and HERD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer