PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERD vs. FVD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HERD vs. FVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERD achieves a 12.63% return, which is significantly higher than FVD's 2.82% return.


HERD

1D
-0.16%
1M
3.12%
YTD
12.63%
6M
14.62%
1Y
30.83%
3Y*
17.53%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*

FVD

1D
0.32%
1M
-1.28%
YTD
2.82%
6M
3.73%
1Y
8.01%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
5.40%
10Y*
8.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HERD vs. FVD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
12.63%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%7.36%
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.82%8.16%10.04%4.11%-5.18%25.08%-0.02%11.17%

Correlation

The correlation between HERD and FVD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.60

The correlation between HERD and FVD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

HERD vs. FVD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HERD
FVD

Technology

18.0%
6.1%

Energy

15.9%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

15.6%
5.6%

Healthcare

14.7%
7.8%

Industrials

13.4%
14.2%

Communication Services

8.3%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

8.2%
11.6%

Basic Materials

4.7%
2.1%

Utilities

0.8%
18.4%

Real Estate

0.3%
8.1%

Financial Services

0.0%
19.1%

Technology

HERD
18.0%
FVD
6.1%

Energy

HERD
15.9%
FVD
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

HERD
15.6%
FVD
5.6%

Healthcare

HERD
14.7%
FVD
7.8%

Industrials

HERD
13.4%
FVD
14.2%

Communication Services

HERD
8.3%
FVD
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

HERD
8.2%
FVD
11.6%

Basic Materials

HERD
4.7%
FVD
2.1%

Utilities

HERD
0.8%
FVD
18.4%

Real Estate

HERD
0.3%
FVD
8.1%

Financial Services

HERD
0.0%
FVD
19.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERD vs. FVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FVD
FVD Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
FVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
FVD Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
FVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
FVD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HERD vs. FVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HERDFVDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.67

0.85

+1.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.72

1.29

+2.43

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.15

+0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.46

1.08

+4.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

18.70

2.97

+15.74

HERD vs. FVD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERD Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the FVD Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERD and FVD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HERDFVDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

0.85

+1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.43

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.58

+0.05

Drawdowns

HERD vs. FVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERD drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, smaller than the maximum FVD drawdown of -51.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERD and FVD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HERDFVDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.41%

-51.00%

+11.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-7.23%

+1.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-11.97%

-6.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.60%

-16.41%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.16%

-5.39%

+5.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-5.44%

+0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.66%

2.63%

-0.97%

Volatility

HERD vs. FVD - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund (FVD) at 2.68%. This indicates that HERD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FVD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HERDFVDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.68%

+0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

6.75%

+0.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.61%

9.48%

+2.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.76%

12.76%

+5.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.50%

15.45%

+5.05%

HERD vs. FVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FVD's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

HERD vs. FVD - Dividend Comparison

HERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.11%, more than FVD's 2.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FVD
First Trust Value Line Dividend Index Fund
2.30%2.36%2.23%2.34%2.20%1.75%2.31%2.03%2.50%2.10%2.04%2.34%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
3.11%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HERD and FVD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERD has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to FVD (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERD dropped -39.41% vs FVD's -51.00%.

On 5-year performance, HERD leads with 10.11% vs 5.40% for FVD. On fees, FVD is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, FVD has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, HERD has performed better with a 10.11% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FVD is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

HERD has the higher dividend yield at 3.11%, compared with 2.30% for FVD.

HERD is categorized as Global Equities, while FVD is Mid Cap Value Equities. HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index, while FVD tracks Value Line Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for HERD and 0.61% for FVD.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERD and FVD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer