PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERD vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HERD vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HERD having a 7.61% return and GCOW slightly lower at 7.34%.


HERD

1D
-0.48%
1M
-2.59%
YTD
7.61%
6M
6.96%
1Y
23.68%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
9.42%
10Y*

GCOW

1D
-0.48%
1M
-6.00%
YTD
7.34%
6M
7.96%
1Y
20.98%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
11.84%
10Y*
9.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HERD vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
7.61%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%6.95%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
7.34%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%5.66%

Correlation

The correlation between HERD and GCOW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.65

The correlation between HERD and GCOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

HERD vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HERD
GCOW

Technology

20.7%
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

15.8%
4.8%

Healthcare

14.4%
14.8%

Energy

14.3%
22.9%

Industrials

13.3%
12.6%

Communication Services

8.0%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.8%
17.0%

Basic Materials

4.8%
8.1%

Utilities

0.7%
4.0%

Real Estate

0.3%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Technology

HERD
20.7%
GCOW
1.3%

Consumer Cyclical

HERD
15.8%
GCOW
4.8%

Healthcare

HERD
14.4%
GCOW
14.8%

Energy

HERD
14.3%
GCOW
22.9%

Industrials

HERD
13.3%
GCOW
12.6%

Communication Services

HERD
8.0%
GCOW
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

HERD
7.8%
GCOW
17.0%

Basic Materials

HERD
4.8%
GCOW
8.1%

Utilities

HERD
0.7%
GCOW
4.0%

Real Estate

HERD
0.3%
GCOW

-

Financial Services

HERD
0.0%
GCOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERD vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HERD vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HERDGCOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.19

3.04

+1.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.55

10.58

+2.96

HERD vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERD Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERD and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HERD vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERD drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, roughly equal to the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERD and GCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HERDGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.41%

-37.64%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-6.93%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-12.35%

-6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.60%

-21.48%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.60%

-6.93%

+2.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-5.83%

+1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

1.99%

-0.24%

Volatility

HERD vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.95%. This indicates that HERD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HERDGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.86%

2.95%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

8.29%

-0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

11.11%

+0.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.75%

13.50%

+4.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.47%

16.17%

+4.30%

HERD vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

HERD vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

HERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than GCOW's 4.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.90%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
2.91%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HERD and GCOW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERD has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to GCOW (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERD dropped -39.41% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 11.84% vs 9.42% for HERD. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.91% for HERD.

HERD is categorized as Global Equities, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for HERD and 0.60% for GCOW.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERD and GCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer