HERD vs. GCOW
HERD (Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF) and GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - HERD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index, while GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, HERD returned 9.42%/yr vs 11.84%/yr for GCOW. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. HERD charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for GCOW.
Performance
HERD vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with HERD having a 7.61% return and GCOW slightly lower at 7.34%.
HERD
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 7.61%
- 6M
- 6.96%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 15.54%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- —
GCOW
- 1D
- -0.48%
- 1M
- -6.00%
- YTD
- 7.34%
- 6M
- 7.96%
- 1Y
- 20.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.59%
- 5Y*
- 11.84%
- 10Y*
- 9.95%
HERD vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 7.61% | 19.07% | 2.91% | 20.72% | -6.96% | 28.58% | 10.71% | 6.95% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 7.34% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 5.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between HERD and GCOW is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019 | 0.65 |
The correlation between HERD and GCOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
HERD vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
HERD
GCOW
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Industrials
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Technology
HERD
GCOW
Consumer Cyclical
HERD
GCOW
Healthcare
HERD
GCOW
Energy
HERD
GCOW
Industrials
HERD
GCOW
Communication Services
HERD
GCOW
Consumer Defensive
HERD
GCOW
Basic Materials
HERD
GCOW
Utilities
HERD
GCOW
Real Estate
HERD
GCOW
-
Financial Services
HERD
GCOW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
HERD vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
HERD
GCOW
HERD vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| HERD | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.33 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 3.04 | +1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | 10.58 | +2.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
HERD vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum HERD drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, roughly equal to the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERD and GCOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| HERD | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.41% | -37.64% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.68% | -6.93% | +1.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -12.35% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.60% | -21.48% | -0.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.60% | -6.93% | +2.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -5.83% | +1.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.75% | 1.99% | -0.24% |
Volatility
HERD vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) has a higher volatility of 3.86% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.95%. This indicates that HERD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| HERD | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.86% | 2.95% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | 8.29% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.96% | 11.11% | +0.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.75% | 13.50% | +4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.47% | 16.17% | +4.30% |
HERD vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
HERD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
HERD vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
HERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than GCOW's 4.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.90% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% |
HERD Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF | 2.91% | 3.75% | 2.43% | 2.54% | 2.50% | 2.02% | 1.95% | 1.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
HERD and GCOW have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
HERD has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to GCOW (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERD dropped -39.41% vs GCOW's -37.64%.
On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 11.84% vs 9.42% for HERD. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 11.84% return vs 9.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.91% for HERD.
HERD is categorized as Global Equities, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for HERD and 0.60% for GCOW.
HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for HERD and GCOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer