PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HERD vs. COWZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HERD vs. COWZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HERD achieves a 14.97% return, which is significantly higher than COWZ's 11.74% return.


HERD

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.23%
6M
10.58%
YTD
14.97%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.92%

COWZ

1D
0.19%
1M
4.89%
6M
7.97%
YTD
11.74%
1Y
23.82%
3Y*
11.64%
5Y*
10.98%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$65.11M$58.70M$60.07M
$194.03K$197.87K$182.95K

HERD vs. COWZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
14.97%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%6.95%
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
11.74%8.98%10.64%14.73%0.19%42.57%11.65%6.89%

Correlation

The correlation between HERD and COWZ is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.73

The correlation between HERD and COWZ shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (all time) to 0.87 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

HERD vs. COWZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
HERD
COWZ

Consumer Cyclical

17.8%
14.3%

Healthcare

16.9%
19.9%

Technology

16.3%
22.9%

Industrials

11.9%
8.4%

Energy

10.4%
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.1%
10.6%

Communication Services

8.8%
8.8%

Basic Materials

6.2%
4.0%

Utilities

1.3%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Financial Services

0.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

HERD
17.8%
COWZ
14.3%

Healthcare

HERD
16.9%
COWZ
19.9%

Technology

HERD
16.3%
COWZ
22.9%

Industrials

HERD
11.9%
COWZ
8.4%

Energy

HERD
10.4%
COWZ
11.2%

Consumer Defensive

HERD
10.1%
COWZ
10.6%

Communication Services

HERD
8.8%
COWZ
8.8%

Basic Materials

HERD
6.2%
COWZ
4.0%

Utilities

HERD
1.3%
COWZ

-

Real Estate

HERD
0.4%
COWZ

-

Financial Services

HERD
0.0%
COWZ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HERD vs. COWZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

COWZ
COWZ Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
COWZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWZ Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
COWZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWZ Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HERD vs. COWZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) and Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HERDCOWZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.34

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.01

3.83

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.56

11.22

+4.34

HERD vs. COWZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HERD Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the COWZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HERD and COWZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HERD vs. COWZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HERD drawdown since its inception was -39.41%, roughly equal to the maximum COWZ drawdown of -38.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HERD and COWZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HERDCOWZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.41%

-38.63%

-0.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.68%

-5.95%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-22.00%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.60%

-22.00%

+0.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-1.40%

+0.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-4.77%

+0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.03%

-0.20%

Volatility

HERD vs. COWZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) is 3.60%, while Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF (COWZ) has a volatility of 5.04%. This indicates that HERD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COWZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HERDCOWZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.60%

5.04%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.72%

8.74%

-0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.83%

11.91%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.68%

17.69%

-0.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.36%

19.86%

+0.50%

HERD vs. COWZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

HERD has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than COWZ's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

HERD vs. COWZ - Dividend Comparison

HERD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.73%, more than COWZ's 1.85% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
COWZ
Pacer US Cash Cows 100 ETF
1.85%2.19%1.82%1.92%1.96%1.48%2.54%1.96%1.67%1.95%0.13%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
2.73%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


HERD and COWZ have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

COWZ has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to HERD (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HERD dropped -39.41% vs COWZ's -38.63%.

On 5-year performance, COWZ leads with 10.98% vs 10.62% for HERD. On fees, COWZ is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, HERD has been the lower-risk option at 3.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, COWZ has performed better with a 10.98% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

COWZ is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

HERD has the higher dividend yield at 2.73%, compared with 1.85% for COWZ.

HERD is categorized as Global Equities, while COWZ is Mid Cap Value Equities. HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index, while COWZ tracks Pacer US Cash Cows 100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for HERD and 0.49% for COWZ.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HERD and COWZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer