TMF vs. ISRG
TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) is Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%), while ISRG (Intuitive Surgical, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, TMF returned -17.99%/yr vs 16.51%/yr for ISRG. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
TMF vs. ISRG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TMF achieves a -11.04% return, which is significantly higher than ISRG's -37.64% return. Over the past 10 years, TMF has underperformed ISRG with an annualized return of -17.99%, while ISRG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.51% annualized return.
TMF
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- -9.25%
- 6M
- -12.35%
- YTD
- -11.04%
- 1Y
- -4.28%
- 3Y*
- -21.59%
- 5Y*
- -33.52%
- 10Y*
- -17.99%
- ALL TIME*
- -6.34%
ISRG
- 1D
- 2.24%
- 1M
- -13.18%
- 6M
- -33.99%
- YTD
- -37.64%
- 1Y
- -31.90%
- 3Y*
- 1.61%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.51%
- ALL TIME*
- 21.90%
TMF vs. ISRG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | -11.04% | -2.94% | -35.95% | -13.01% | -72.60% | -19.80% | 39.02% | 34.75% | -11.01% | 22.72% |
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | -37.64% | 8.51% | 54.72% | 27.14% | -26.15% | 31.76% | 38.39% | 23.43% | 31.23% | 72.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TMF and ISRG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2009 | -0.12 |
The correlation between TMF and ISRG shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (all time) to 0.15 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TMF vs. ISRG — Risk / Return Rank
TMF
ISRG
TMF vs. ISRG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) and Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TMF | ISRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.75 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 0.84 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.16 | -0.77 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.32 | -1.77 | +1.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TMF vs. ISRG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TMF drawdown since its inception was -92.89%, which is greater than ISRG's maximum drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMF and ISRG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TMF | ISRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.89% | -82.26% | -10.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.51% | -41.74% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.47% | -43.42% | -10.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.81% | -49.90% | -38.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.89% | -49.90% | -42.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.64% | -42.15% | -50.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.97% | -21.33% | -22.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.22% | 18.06% | -4.84% |
Volatility
TMF vs. ISRG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) is 7.53%, while Intuitive Surgical, Inc. (ISRG) has a volatility of 19.26%. This indicates that TMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TMF | ISRG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.53% | 19.26% | -11.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.87% | 27.17% | -7.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.62% | 35.38% | -7.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.39% | 34.17% | +12.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 43.72% | 32.87% | +10.85% |
Dividends
TMF vs. ISRG - Dividend Comparison
TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.44%, while ISRG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISRG Intuitive Surgical, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 4.44% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TMF and ISRG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ISRG has higher volatility (19.26%) compared to TMF (7.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMF dropped -92.89% vs ISRG's -82.26%.
TMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.16 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TMF and ISRG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer