TMDV vs. AUSF

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - TMDV tracks the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index while AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TMDV returned 2.41%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for AUSF. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TMDV charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

TMDV vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TMDV achieves a 4.53% return, which is significantly lower than AUSF's 6.72% return.

TMDV

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.05%
• YTD: 4.53%
• 6M: 4.29%
• 1Y: 5.96%
• 3Y*: 4.85%
• 5Y*: 2.41%
• 10Y*: —

AUSF

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 0.23%
• YTD: 6.72%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 15.11%
• 3Y*: 20.14%
• 5Y*: 12.71%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TMDV vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	4.53%	2.91%	2.64%	2.25%	-5.10%	23.45%	4.82%	3.26%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	6.72%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.18%	27.48%	1.27%	3.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TMDV and AUSF is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019	0.86

The correlation between TMDV and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

TMDV vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TMDV	AUSF
Consumer Defensive	23.8%	8.5%
Financial Services	16.0%	18.7%
Industrials	15.9%	11.7%
Utilities	12.3%	4.0%
Basic Materials	11.7%	4.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	7.8%
Healthcare	5.6%	12.0%
Real Estate	4.6%	4.1%
Energy	3.0%	5.2%
Technology	1.5%	13.5%
Communication Services	-	10.6%

Return for Risk

TMDV vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TMDV

TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 16
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 16

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 44
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 39
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TMDV vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TMDV	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.50	-1.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.82	2.18	-1.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.26	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.61	2.60	-1.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.50	7.54	-6.04
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TMDV vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TMDV Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TMDV and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TMDV	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	1.50	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	0.94	-0.77
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.65	-0.34

Drawdowns

TMDV vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TMDV drawdown since its inception was -33.42%, smaller than the maximum AUSF drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TMDV and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	TMDV	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.42%	-44.25%	+10.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-5.84%	-3.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.02%	-12.29%	-3.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.11%	-14.23%	-2.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.56%	-2.26%	-4.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.43%	-4.22%	-1.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	2.01%	+1.98%

Volatility

TMDV vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) has a higher volatility of 2.97% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 2.41%. This indicates that TMDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TMDV	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.97%	2.41%	+0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.53%	6.65%	+1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.10%	10.14%	+1.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.43%	13.65%	+0.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.64%	19.07%	-0.43%

TMDV vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TMDV has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

TMDV vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

TMDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, less than AUSF's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.76%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	2.62%	2.65%	2.70%	2.45%	2.46%	2.14%	2.28%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TMDV and AUSF in my portfolio?

TMDV and AUSF have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TMDV or AUSF?

TMDV has higher volatility (2.97%) compared to AUSF (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TMDV dropped -33.42% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, TMDV or AUSF?

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 12.71% vs 2.41% for TMDV. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TMDV or AUSF?

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 12.71% return vs 2.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TMDV or AUSF?

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for TMDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TMDV or AUSF?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 2.62% for TMDV.

What is the main difference between TMDV and AUSF?

TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for TMDV and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUSF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.