AUSF vs. SFLR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) and SFLR (Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AUSF is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index, while SFLR is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Innovator. AUSF is passively managed, while SFLR is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AUSF returned 19.79%/yr vs 14.80%/yr for SFLR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUSF charges 0.27%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SFLR.

Performance

AUSF vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 6.60% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's 3.43% return.

AUSF

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 6M: 5.99%
• 1Y: 14.03%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: —

SFLR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: -0.63%
• YTD: 3.43%
• 6M: 3.07%
• 1Y: 15.38%
• 3Y*: 14.80%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUSF vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	6.60%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.40%
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	3.43%	13.29%	19.99%	21.20%	0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between AUSF and SFLR is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2022	0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between AUSF and SFLR has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

AUSF vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 43
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

SFLR

SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 49
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 51
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSF vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUSF	SFLR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	1.59	-0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	2.15	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.30	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.41	2.27	+0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.87	8.91	-2.04

AUSF vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSF Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSF and SFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AUSF vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and SFLR.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUSF	SFLR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-44.25%	-12.13%	-32.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.84%	-6.79%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	-12.13%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.45%	-2.61%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.20%	-1.75%	-2.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	1.73%	+0.32%

Volatility

AUSF vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 3.02%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 4.37%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUSF	SFLR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.02%	4.37%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.95%	7.51%	-0.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.27%	9.72%	+0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.63%	10.32%	+3.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.03%	10.32%	+8.71%

AUSF vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

AUSF vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, more than SFLR's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.76%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%
SFLR Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF	0.33%	0.33%	0.42%	1.16%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUSF and SFLR in my portfolio?

AUSF and SFLR have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUSF or SFLR?

SFLR has higher volatility (4.37%) compared to AUSF (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUSF dropped -44.25% vs SFLR's -12.13%.

Which ETF is better, AUSF or SFLR?

On 3-year performance, AUSF leads with 19.79% vs 14.80% for SFLR. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AUSF or SFLR?

Over the 3-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 19.79% return vs 14.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUSF or SFLR?

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SFLR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUSF or SFLR?

AUSF has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.33% for SFLR.

What is the main difference between AUSF and SFLR?

AUSF is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SFLR is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Global X and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.27% for AUSF and 0.89% for SFLR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.