PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUSF vs. SFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

AUSF vs. SFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AUSF vs. SFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
4.93%13.69%16.05%22.26%1.34%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
-3.85%13.29%19.99%21.20%1.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly higher than SFLR's -3.85% return.


AUSF

1D
1.17%
1M
-3.55%
YTD
4.93%
6M
5.58%
1Y
14.03%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*

SFLR

1D
1.67%
1M
-3.82%
YTD
-3.85%
6M
-1.57%
1Y
13.21%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


AUSF vs. SFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than SFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

AUSF vs. SFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUSF
AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

SFLR
SFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
SFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUSF vs. SFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUSFSFLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

1.23

-0.25

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.40

1.71

-0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.25

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.99

-0.59

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.04

7.91

-1.87

AUSF vs. SFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUSF Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the SFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUSF and SFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUSFSFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.23

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

1.47

-0.83

Correlation

The correlation between AUSF and SFLR is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

AUSF vs. SFLR - Dividend Comparison

AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than SFLR's 0.35% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
AUSF
Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF
2.71%2.78%2.63%1.83%2.51%2.22%2.95%4.02%1.46%
SFLR
Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF
0.35%0.33%0.42%1.16%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

AUSF vs. SFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than SFLR's maximum drawdown of -12.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and SFLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AUSFSFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.25%

-12.13%

-32.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-6.79%

-4.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.90%

-5.24%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-1.76%

-2.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.71%

+0.80%

Volatility

AUSF vs. SFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 3.22%, while Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF (SFLR) has a volatility of 3.72%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AUSFSFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

3.72%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

7.42%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.41%

10.83%

+3.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.69%

10.30%

+3.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.25%

10.30%

+8.95%