AUSF vs. FELG
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG).
AUSF and FELG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUSF is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index (USD). It was launched on Aug 24, 2018. FELG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 20, 2023.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AUSF or FELG.
Performance
AUSF vs. FELG - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 19.83% return, which is significantly lower than FELG's 30.87% return.
AUSF
19.83%
0.07%
9.81%
30.80%
14.16%
N/A
FELG
30.87%
1.15%
13.27%
N/A
N/A
N/A
Key characteristics
| AUSF | FELG | |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Std Dev | 12.03% | 16.99% |
| Max Drawdown | -44.24% | -13.29% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.78% | -2.51% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUSF vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is higher than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Correlation
The correlation between AUSF and FELG is 0.40, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AUSF vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Not enough dataDividends
AUSF vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison
AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%, more than FELG's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.22% | 1.83% | 1.99% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.03% | 1.47% |
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.40% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AUSF vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.24%, which is greater than FELG's maximum drawdown of -13.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and FELG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AUSF vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 4.37%, while Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.