AUSF vs. EYLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD).
AUSF and EYLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AUSF is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. It was launched on Aug 24, 2018. EYLD is an actively managed fund by Cambria. It was launched on Jul 14, 2016.
Performance
AUSF vs. EYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AUSF vs. EYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 4.93% | 13.69% | 16.05% | 22.26% | -0.18% | 27.48% | 1.27% | 24.06% | -10.79% |
EYLD Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF | 8.65% | 29.39% | 4.72% | 18.77% | -16.10% | 11.44% | 10.13% | 22.00% | -8.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUSF achieves a 4.93% return, which is significantly lower than EYLD's 8.65% return.
AUSF
- 1D
- 1.17%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- 4.93%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- 1Y
- 14.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.98%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
EYLD
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -7.14%
- YTD
- 8.65%
- 6M
- 15.08%
- 1Y
- 38.64%
- 3Y*
- 19.59%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AUSF vs. EYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUSF has a 0.27% expense ratio, which is lower than EYLD's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AUSF vs. EYLD — Risk / Return Rank
AUSF
EYLD
AUSF vs. EYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) and Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUSF | EYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 2.09 | -1.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.40 | 2.62 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.41 | -0.20 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 2.71 | -1.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 12.03 | -5.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUSF | EYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 2.09 | -1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.44 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.64 | 0.50 | +0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between AUSF and EYLD is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AUSF vs. EYLD - Dividend Comparison
AUSF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, less than EYLD's 5.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF | 2.71% | 2.78% | 2.63% | 1.83% | 2.51% | 2.22% | 2.95% | 4.02% | 1.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
EYLD Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF | 5.57% | 5.40% | 5.16% | 5.54% | 6.97% | 7.27% | 3.02% | 4.21% | 7.87% | 2.77% | 0.75% |
Drawdowns
AUSF vs. EYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUSF drawdown since its inception was -44.25%, which is greater than EYLD's maximum drawdown of -41.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUSF and EYLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUSF | EYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.25% | -41.82% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.84% | -13.65% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.23% | -30.26% | +16.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.90% | -7.70% | +3.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -10.43% | +6.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 3.08% | -0.57% |
Volatility
AUSF vs. EYLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) is 3.22%, while Cambria Emerging Shareholder Yield ETF (EYLD) has a volatility of 9.30%. This indicates that AUSF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AUSF | EYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.22% | 9.30% | -6.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.44% | 12.90% | -5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.41% | 18.61% | -4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.69% | 18.10% | -4.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.25% | 21.62% | -2.37% |