TLHIX vs. FRQHX

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

TLHIX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund) and FRQHX (Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TLHIX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for FRQHX.

Performance

TLHIX vs. FRQHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TLHIX

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 0.21%
• 6M: 5.21%
• YTD: 6.97%
• 1Y: 14.62%
• 3Y*: 12.55%
• 5Y*: 6.69%
• 10Y*: 8.73%

FRQHX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLHIX vs. FRQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund	6.97%	15.76%	10.59%	15.54%	-15.72%	11.65%	14.76%	6.58%
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.71%	10.01%	4.68%	8.75%	-12.22%	4.04%	9.80%	3.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TLHIX and FRQHX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2019	0.85

The correlation between TLHIX and FRQHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TLHIX vs. FRQHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLHIX

TLHIX Risk / Return Rank: 63
TLHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
TLHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
TLHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
TLHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
TLHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 67

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLHIX vs. FRQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TLHIX	FRQHX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.81	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.46	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TLHIX	FRQHX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.86%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.15%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.48%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.44%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TLHIX	FRQHX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.08%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.37%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.35%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.06%	—	—

TLHIX vs. FRQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLHIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQHX's 0.26% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TLHIX vs. FRQHX - Dividend Comparison

TLHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, more than FRQHX's 3.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FRQHX Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6	3.25%	3.20%	3.20%	2.95%	5.25%	6.22%	3.70%	2.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund	3.93%	4.20%	3.62%	2.44%	2.82%	3.21%	2.06%	2.25%	2.68%	0.14%	2.49%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLHIX and FRQHX in my portfolio?

TLHIX and FRQHX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.