PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLHIX vs. TFITX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLHIX vs. TFITX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund (TFITX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLHIX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly lower than TFITX's 12.03% return.


TLHIX

1D
0.84%
1M
1.40%
YTD
7.64%
6M
7.60%
1Y
18.71%
3Y*
13.32%
5Y*
7.13%
10Y*
9.10%

TFITX

1D
1.29%
1M
1.90%
YTD
12.03%
6M
11.83%
1Y
28.15%
3Y*
18.92%
5Y*
11.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLHIX vs. TFITX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TLHIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund
7.64%15.76%10.59%15.54%-15.72%11.65%6.99%
TFITX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund
12.03%21.24%15.76%21.16%-17.62%18.06%10.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TLHIX and TFITX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.98

The correlation between TLHIX and TFITX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLHIX vs. TFITX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLHIX
TLHIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TLHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TLHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

TFITX
TFITX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
TFITX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFITX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFITX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TFITX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFITX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLHIX vs. TFITX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund (TFITX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TLHIXTFITXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.41

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.07

-0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

13.38

-0.36

TLHIX vs. TFITX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the TFITX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLHIX and TFITX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TLHIX vs. TFITX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLHIX drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, smaller than the maximum TFITX drawdown of -25.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLHIX and TFITX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLHIXTFITXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.86%

-25.64%

+1.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.15%

-9.12%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.46%

-15.56%

+6.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.15%

-25.64%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.48%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

-5.24%

+1.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.43%

2.08%

-0.65%

Volatility

TLHIX vs. TFITX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) is 3.40%, while TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund (TFITX) has a volatility of 5.14%. This indicates that TLHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFITX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLHIXTFITXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

5.14%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.89%

10.46%

-3.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.25%

12.61%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.33%

15.11%

-4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.13%

14.90%

-3.77%

TLHIX vs. TFITX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLHIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than TFITX's 0.11% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TLHIX vs. TFITX - Dividend Comparison

TLHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, more than TFITX's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TFITX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2065 Fund
2.18%2.44%2.12%2.05%2.09%1.84%1.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TLHIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund
3.90%4.20%3.62%2.44%2.82%3.21%2.06%2.25%2.68%0.14%2.49%0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, TLHIX and TFITX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TFITX has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to TLHIX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLHIX dropped -23.86% vs TFITX's -25.64%.

TLHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLHIX and TFITX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer