PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQHX vs. FSXAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FRQHX vs. FSXAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FRQHX vs. FSXAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
-0.45%10.01%4.68%5.85%
FSXAX
Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund
-2.73%16.00%10.39%9.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FRQHX achieves a -0.45% return, which is significantly higher than FSXAX's -2.73% return.


FRQHX

1D
0.25%
1M
-3.17%
YTD
-0.45%
6M
0.85%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
6.27%
5Y*
2.65%
10Y*

FSXAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-6.59%
YTD
-2.73%
6M
-0.61%
1Y
11.94%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FRQHX vs. FSXAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than FSXAX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FRQHX vs. FSXAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FRQHX
FRQHX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FRQHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQHX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

FSXAX
FSXAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FSXAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSXAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSXAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FSXAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSXAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FRQHX vs. FSXAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FRQHXFSXAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.62

1.11

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.25

1.61

+0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.23

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

1.41

+0.75

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.67

6.23

+2.44

FRQHX vs. FSXAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FRQHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.62, which is higher than the FSXAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FRQHX and FSXAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FRQHXFSXAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.62

1.11

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.21

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between FRQHX and FSXAX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FRQHX vs. FSXAX - Dividend Comparison

FRQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.38%, more than FSXAX's 2.27% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.38%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%
FSXAX
Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund
2.27%2.21%3.97%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FRQHX vs. FSXAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FRQHX drawdown since its inception was -16.90%, which is greater than FSXAX's maximum drawdown of -10.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FRQHX and FSXAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQHXFSXAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.90%

-10.04%

-6.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.41%

-7.93%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-6.87%

+3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.88%

-1.50%

-2.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

1.79%

-0.94%

Volatility

FRQHX vs. FSXAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) is 1.93%, while Fidelity Sustainable Target Date 2030 Fund (FSXAX) has a volatility of 3.98%. This indicates that FRQHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSXAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FRQHXFSXAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

3.98%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.84%

6.44%

-3.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.60%

10.87%

-6.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.51%

9.57%

-4.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.76%

9.57%

-3.81%