TLHIX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
TLHIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: TLHIX or SCHG.
Correlation
The correlation between TLHIX and SCHG is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
TLHIX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
TLHIX:
1.57
SCHG:
1.71
TLHIX:
2.20
SCHG:
2.28
TLHIX:
1.29
SCHG:
1.31
TLHIX:
2.96
SCHG:
2.53
TLHIX:
8.60
SCHG:
9.59
TLHIX:
1.43%
SCHG:
3.26%
TLHIX:
7.83%
SCHG:
18.13%
TLHIX:
-23.86%
SCHG:
-34.59%
TLHIX:
-0.88%
SCHG:
-2.23%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLHIX achieves a 2.24% return, which is significantly higher than SCHG's 2.08% return. Over the past 10 years, TLHIX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 7.19%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.82% annualized return.
TLHIX
2.24%
2.24%
5.81%
11.98%
7.17%
7.19%
SCHG
2.08%
2.08%
18.85%
32.20%
19.64%
16.82%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLHIX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLHIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
TLHIX vs. SCHG — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
TLHIX
SCHG
TLHIX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
TLHIX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
TLHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, more than SCHG's 0.39% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund | 2.58% | 2.63% | 2.31% | 2.21% | 1.92% | 1.71% | 2.15% | 2.41% | 1.89% | 2.05% | 2.15% | 2.13% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.39% | 0.40% | 0.47% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% | 1.09% |
Drawdowns
TLHIX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLHIX drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLHIX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
TLHIX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) is 2.41%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) has a volatility of 6.30%. This indicates that TLHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.