PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FRQHX vs. PADLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FRQHX vs. PADLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FRQHX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

PADLX

1D
0.70%
1M
0.18%
6M
3.68%
YTD
5.01%
1Y
10.42%
3Y*
10.15%
5Y*
3.63%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FRQHX vs. PADLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
3.71%10.01%4.68%8.75%-12.22%4.04%9.80%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
5.01%10.83%8.34%11.01%-12.54%2.93%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FRQHX and PADLX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2020

0.89

The correlation between FRQHX and PADLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FRQHX vs. PADLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FRQHX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


PADLX
PADLX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PADLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PADLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PADLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PADLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PADLX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FRQHX vs. PADLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6 (FRQHX) and Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund (PADLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FRQHXPADLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.04

FRQHX vs. PADLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FRQHX vs. PADLX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FRQHXPADLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

Volatility

FRQHX vs. PADLX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FRQHXPADLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.47%

FRQHX vs. PADLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FRQHX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than PADLX's 0.22% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FRQHX vs. PADLX - Dividend Comparison

FRQHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, less than PADLX's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FRQHX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class K6
2.93%3.20%3.20%2.95%5.25%6.22%3.70%2.57%
PADLX
Putnam Retirement Advantage Maturity Fund
4.61%5.03%3.71%2.91%1.01%1.45%1.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FRQHX and PADLX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FRQHX and PADLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer