TLHIX vs. GOVZ
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ).
TLHIX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 29, 2009. GOVZ is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA Long US Treasury Principal STRIPS Index. It was launched on Sep 22, 2020.
Performance
TLHIX vs. GOVZ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TLHIX vs. GOVZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund | -2.76% | 15.76% | 10.59% | 15.54% | -15.72% | 11.65% | 12.36% |
GOVZ iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF | -0.07% | -1.81% | -16.24% | 0.90% | -41.03% | -4.86% | -5.61% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TLHIX achieves a -2.76% return, which is significantly lower than GOVZ's -0.07% return.
TLHIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -5.92%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -0.61%
- 1Y
- 11.82%
- 3Y*
- 10.84%
- 5Y*
- 5.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
GOVZ
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -6.18%
- YTD
- -0.07%
- 6M
- -3.49%
- 1Y
- -6.30%
- 3Y*
- -8.76%
- 5Y*
- -10.89%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TLHIX vs. GOVZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLHIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than GOVZ's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TLHIX vs. GOVZ — Risk / Return Rank
TLHIX
GOVZ
TLHIX vs. GOVZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TLHIX | GOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | -0.33 | +1.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | -0.33 | +2.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 0.96 | +0.29 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | -0.29 | +1.78 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | -0.50 | +7.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLHIX | GOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | -0.33 | +1.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | -0.46 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | -0.59 | +1.31 |
Correlation
The correlation between TLHIX and GOVZ is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TLHIX vs. GOVZ - Dividend Comparison
TLHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.32%, less than GOVZ's 5.04% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund | 4.32% | 4.20% | 3.62% | 2.44% | 2.82% | 3.21% | 2.06% | 2.25% | 2.68% | 0.14% | 2.49% | 0.25% |
GOVZ iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF | 5.04% | 5.00% | 4.68% | 3.84% | 3.69% | 1.76% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TLHIX vs. GOVZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLHIX drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, smaller than the maximum GOVZ drawdown of -59.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLHIX and GOVZ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLHIX | GOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.86% | -59.65% | +35.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.32% | -16.08% | +8.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.15% | -57.63% | +35.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.15% | -56.09% | +49.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -39.38% | +35.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.62% | 9.40% | -7.78% |
Volatility
TLHIX vs. GOVZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) is 3.31%, while iShares 25+ Year Treasury STRIPS Bond ETF (GOVZ) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that TLHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOVZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TLHIX | GOVZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 5.79% | -2.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.69% | 10.94% | -5.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.94% | 19.33% | -9.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.19% | 23.95% | -13.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 23.61% | -12.54% |