TLHIX vs. FOTKX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TLHIX (TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund) and FOTKX (Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, TLHIX returned 7.14%/yr vs 3.77%/yr for FOTKX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TLHIX charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for FOTKX.

Performance

TLHIX vs. FOTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TLHIX achieves a 7.94% return, which is significantly higher than FOTKX's 5.15% return.

TLHIX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 3.61%
• YTD: 7.94%
• 6M: 8.35%
• 1Y: 19.36%
• 3Y*: 14.15%
• 5Y*: 7.14%
• 10Y*: 9.07%

FOTKX

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: 1.42%
• YTD: 5.15%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 12.73%
• 3Y*: 9.23%
• 5Y*: 3.77%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLHIX vs. FOTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund	7.94%	15.76%	10.59%	15.54%	-15.72%	11.65%	14.76%	21.35%	-5.07%	5.86%
FOTKX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6	5.15%	11.66%	5.55%	9.97%	-13.05%	5.68%	11.29%	14.46%	-3.65%	5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TLHIX and FOTKX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017	0.91

The correlation between TLHIX and FOTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TLHIX vs. FOTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLHIX

TLHIX Risk / Return Rank: 74
TLHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
TLHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
TLHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
TLHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
TLHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

FOTKX

FOTKX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FOTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FOTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FOTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FOTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
FOTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLHIX vs. FOTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TLHIX	FOTKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.54	2.61	-0.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.63	3.82	-0.19
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.54	-0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	3.28	-0.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.09	14.52	-0.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TLHIX vs. FOTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TLHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is comparable to the FOTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TLHIX and FOTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TLHIX	FOTKX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.54	2.61	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.59	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	0.86	-0.09

Drawdowns

TLHIX vs. FOTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLHIX drawdown since its inception was -23.86%, which is greater than FOTKX's maximum drawdown of -18.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLHIX and FOTKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TLHIX	FOTKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.86%	-18.29%	-5.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.15%	-4.03%	-2.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.46%	-5.71%	-3.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.15%	-18.29%	-3.86%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-23.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.50%	-3.56%	+0.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.39%	0.91%	+0.48%

Volatility

TLHIX vs. FOTKX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund (TLHIX) has a higher volatility of 2.54% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) at 1.93%. This indicates that TLHIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TLHIX	FOTKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.54%	1.93%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.25%	4.14%	+2.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.76%	4.92%	+2.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.25%	6.38%	+3.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.11%	6.42%	+4.69%

TLHIX vs. FOTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLHIX has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than FOTKX's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

TLHIX vs. FOTKX - Dividend Comparison

TLHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than FOTKX's 4.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FOTKX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6	4.92%	5.25%	3.32%	2.98%	7.41%	9.53%	6.17%	6.00%	7.24%	3.57%	0.00%	0.00%
TLHIX TIAA-CREF Lifecycle Index 2030 Fund	3.89%	4.20%	3.62%	2.44%	2.82%	3.21%	2.06%	2.25%	2.68%	0.14%	2.49%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TLHIX and FOTKX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, TLHIX and FOTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TLHIX or FOTKX?

TLHIX has higher volatility (2.54%) compared to FOTKX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TLHIX dropped -23.86% vs FOTKX's -18.29%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FOTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.