PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOTKX vs. TCLTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOTKX vs. TCLTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOTKX achieves a 5.64% return, which is significantly higher than TCLTX's 5.00% return.


FOTKX

1D
0.66%
1M
1.46%
YTD
5.64%
6M
5.74%
1Y
12.62%
3Y*
9.04%
5Y*
3.97%
10Y*

TCLTX

1D
0.61%
1M
1.36%
YTD
5.00%
6M
5.07%
1Y
13.58%
3Y*
10.09%
5Y*
4.85%
10Y*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOTKX vs. TCLTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
5.64%11.66%5.55%9.97%-13.05%5.68%11.29%14.46%-3.65%5.22%
TCLTX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund
5.00%12.09%8.17%11.68%-13.76%8.19%12.11%17.49%-5.43%4.58%

Correlation

The correlation between FOTKX and TCLTX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.93

The correlation between FOTKX and TCLTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOTKX vs. TCLTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOTKX
FOTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
FOTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
FOTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TCLTX
TCLTX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TCLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TCLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
TCLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TCLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
TCLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOTKX vs. TCLTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOTKXTCLTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.42

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.16

2.72

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.63

11.81

+1.82

FOTKX vs. TCLTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOTKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is comparable to the TCLTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOTKX and TCLTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOTKX vs. TCLTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOTKX drawdown since its inception was -18.29%, smaller than the maximum TCLTX drawdown of -44.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTKX and TCLTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOTKXTCLTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

-44.15%

+25.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-5.01%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.71%

-6.99%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.29%

-18.99%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-5.19%

+1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.15%

-0.22%

Volatility

FOTKX vs. TCLTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund (TCLTX) have volatilities of 2.44% and 2.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOTKXTCLTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

2.47%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.62%

5.18%

-0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.34%

6.23%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.44%

7.69%

-1.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.44%

8.36%

-1.92%

FOTKX vs. TCLTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOTKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than TCLTX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOTKX vs. TCLTX - Dividend Comparison

FOTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%, more than TCLTX's 4.27% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
4.90%5.25%3.32%2.98%7.41%9.53%6.17%6.00%7.24%3.57%0.00%0.00%
TCLTX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2020 Fund
4.27%4.49%3.33%2.38%5.36%7.49%4.91%3.36%6.53%2.44%5.09%4.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FOTKX and TCLTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TCLTX has higher volatility (2.47%) compared to FOTKX (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOTKX dropped -18.29% vs TCLTX's -44.15%.

FOTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOTKX and TCLTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer