PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FOTKX vs. PLTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FOTKX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FOTKX achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than PLTHX's 10.63% return.


FOTKX

1D
-0.20%
1M
1.26%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.40%
1Y
12.08%
3Y*
9.19%
5Y*
3.85%
10Y*

PLTHX

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.56%
YTD
10.63%
6M
9.95%
1Y
25.90%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
10.35%
10Y*
12.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FOTKX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
5.43%11.66%5.55%9.97%-13.05%5.68%11.29%14.46%-3.65%5.22%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
10.63%19.91%17.18%20.28%-18.52%20.05%16.11%26.46%-9.93%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FOTKX and PLTHX is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.84

The correlation between FOTKX and PLTHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FOTKX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FOTKX
FOTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FOTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FOTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTHX
PLTHX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
PLTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FOTKX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FOTKXPLTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.11

3.15

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.39

14.01

-0.62

FOTKX vs. PLTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FOTKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is comparable to the PLTHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FOTKX and PLTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FOTKX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FOTKX drawdown since its inception was -18.29%, smaller than the maximum PLTHX drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FOTKX and PLTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FOTKXPLTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.29%

-33.26%

+14.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.03%

-8.60%

+4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.71%

-16.64%

+10.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.29%

-25.49%

+7.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-0.97%

+0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.54%

-4.79%

+1.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

1.93%

-1.00%

Volatility

FOTKX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) is 2.39%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) has a volatility of 5.05%. This indicates that FOTKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FOTKXPLTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.39%

5.05%

-2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.63%

10.44%

-5.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.35%

12.70%

-7.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.45%

15.62%

-9.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.44%

16.02%

-9.58%

FOTKX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FOTKX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTHX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

FOTKX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison

FOTKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than PLTHX's 3.95% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
4.91%5.25%3.32%2.98%7.41%9.53%6.17%6.00%7.24%3.57%0.00%0.00%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
3.95%4.37%4.30%2.76%7.91%3.84%2.91%3.67%3.47%2.37%2.20%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FOTKX and PLTHX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTHX has higher volatility (5.05%) compared to FOTKX (2.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FOTKX dropped -18.29% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.

FOTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FOTKX and PLTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer