TINY vs. HACK

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TINY (ProShares Nanotechnology ETF) and HACK (ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TINY tracks the Solactive Nanotechnology Index while HACK tracks the Prime Cyber Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINY returned 31.25%/yr vs 27.72%/yr for HACK. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TINY charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for HACK.

Performance

TINY vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINY achieves a 59.78% return, which is significantly higher than HACK's 27.17% return.

TINY

• 1D: 2.63%
• 1M: 15.50%
• YTD: 59.78%
• 6M: 60.21%
• 1Y: 114.15%
• 3Y*: 31.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HACK

• 1D: -3.00%
• 1M: 24.54%
• YTD: 27.17%
• 6M: 21.31%
• 1Y: 21.52%
• 3Y*: 27.72%
• 5Y*: 11.82%
• 10Y*: 15.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINY vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	59.78%	19.98%	6.63%	47.97%	-34.14%	8.73%
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF	27.17%	7.97%	23.49%	37.44%	-28.16%	-4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between TINY and HACK is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.34
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.64

Over the past year, the correlation between TINY and HACK has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TINY vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINY	HACK
Technology	79.0%	93.0%
Healthcare	8.6%	-
Basic Materials	7.7%	-
Industrials	4.7%	6.9%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TINY vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINY

TINY Risk / Return Rank: 90
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 85
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 93

HACK

HACK Risk / Return Rank: 23
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 24
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINY vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) and ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TINY	HACK	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.52	0.85	+2.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.97	1.27	+2.70
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.16	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.85	1.05	+5.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	24.13	2.52	+21.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINY vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINY Sharpe Ratio is 3.52, which is higher than the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINY and HACK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TINY	HACK	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.52	0.85	+2.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.57	0.57	-0.01

Drawdowns

TINY vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINY drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, roughly equal to the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINY and HACK.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINY	HACK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.79%	-42.68%	-1.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.75%	-20.67%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.13%	-21.90%	-20.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.68%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-38.68%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.00%	+3.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.16%	-11.63%	-4.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.75%	8.58%	-3.83%

Volatility

TINY vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a higher volatility of 12.04% compared to ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF (HACK) at 10.68%. This indicates that TINY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HACK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINY	HACK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.04%	10.68%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.40%	21.52%	+4.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.66%	25.47%	+7.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.37%	24.18%	+8.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.37%	23.27%	+9.10%

TINY vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINY has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINY vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

TINY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, more than HACK's 0.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
HACK ETFMG Prime Cyber Security ETF	0.06%	0.07%	0.14%	0.20%	0.24%	0.26%	1.11%	0.14%	0.09%	0.01%	1.23%
TINY ProShares Nanotechnology ETF	0.18%	0.29%	0.01%	0.35%	0.42%	0.07%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINY and HACK in my portfolio?

TINY and HACK have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINY or HACK?

TINY has higher volatility (12.04%) compared to HACK (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINY dropped -43.79% vs HACK's -42.68%.

Which ETF is better, TINY or HACK?

On 3-year performance, TINY leads with 31.25% vs 27.72% for HACK. On fees, TINY is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, HACK has been the lower-risk option at 10.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINY or HACK?

Over the 3-year period, TINY has performed better with a 31.25% return vs 27.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINY or HACK?

TINY is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINY or HACK?

TINY has the higher dividend yield at 0.18%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

What is the main difference between TINY and HACK?

TINY tracks Solactive Nanotechnology Index, while HACK tracks Prime Cyber Defense Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and ETFMG. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINY and 0.60% for HACK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.52 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.