TINT vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
TINT and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TINT is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net. It was launched on Oct 26, 2021. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both TINT and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
TINT vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TINT vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 7.36% | 16.13% | -13.37% | 20.04% | -28.14% | 1.71% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -13.35% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 8.73% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 7.36% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's -13.35% return.
TINT
- 1D
- 3.45%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- 7.36%
- 6M
- 9.25%
- 1Y
- 28.46%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLD
- 1D
- 6.72%
- 1M
- -10.26%
- YTD
- -13.35%
- 6M
- -11.03%
- 1Y
- 37.53%
- 3Y*
- 35.41%
- 5Y*
- 15.27%
- 10Y*
- 29.40%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TINT vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TINT vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank
TINT
QLD
TINT vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TINT | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 0.84 | +0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 1.43 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.59 | 1.49 | +0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.69 | 4.88 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TINT | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 0.84 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.34 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.05 | 0.53 | -0.58 |
Correlation
The correlation between TINT and QLD is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TINT vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, more than QLD's 0.19% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF | 1.14% | 1.27% | 1.47% | 0.99% | 1.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Drawdowns
TINT vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and QLD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINT | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.36% | -83.13% | +41.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.53% | -25.13% | +7.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.94% | -20.10% | +8.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -18.30% | -3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 7.67% | -2.77% |
Volatility
TINT vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) is 10.91%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 12.96%. This indicates that TINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TINT | QLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.91% | 12.96% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.82% | 25.55% | -9.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.49% | 44.91% | -20.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 44.77% | -21.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.90% | 44.47% | -21.57% |