TINT vs. FMAT

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and FMAT (Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FMAT is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINT returned 4.82%/yr vs 7.48%/yr for FMAT. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FMAT.

Performance

TINT vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly higher than FMAT's 8.05% return.

TINT

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: -2.42%
• 6M: 7.68%
• YTD: 15.69%
• 1Y: 26.92%
• 3Y*: 4.82%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 0.41%

FMAT

• 1D: -2.33%
• 1M: -4.27%
• 6M: -0.47%
• YTD: 8.05%
• 1Y: 16.93%
• 3Y*: 7.48%
• 5Y*: 5.78%
• 10Y*: 9.55%
• ALL TIME*: 8.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	$2.12M	$3.31M	$3.29M
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	$21.03K	$17.30K	$33.22K

TINT vs. FMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	15.69%	16.13%	-13.37%	20.04%	-28.14%	1.56%
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	8.05%	12.11%	0.47%	13.71%	-11.54%	5.32%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and FMAT is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2021	0.82

The correlation between TINT and FMAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.82 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TINT vs. FMAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINT	FMAT
Basic Materials	70.5%	90.2%
Technology	18.4%	0.1%
Industrials	7.9%	0.1%
Financial Services	2.5%	-
Healthcare	0.7%	0.6%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	7.1%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.1%
Energy	-	0.4%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TINT vs. FMAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TINT

TINT Risk / Return Rank: 41
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 42
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 42

FMAT

FMAT Risk / Return Rank: 34
FMAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 35
FMAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FMAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FMAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FMAT Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TINT vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINT	FMAT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	0.86	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.58	1.30	+0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.15	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.47	1.19	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.56	3.41	+1.15

TINT vs. FMAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the FMAT Sharpe Ratio of 0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINT and FMAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TINT vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, roughly equal to the maximum FMAT drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and FMAT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINT	FMAT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-41.11%	-0.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.53%	-13.48%	-4.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.42%	-23.17%	-7.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.40%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.48%	-8.21%	-1.27%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.64%	-6.86%	-13.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.63%	4.69%	+0.94%

Volatility

TINT vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) have volatilities of 5.54% and 5.53%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINT	FMAT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.54%	5.53%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.41%	15.12%	+6.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.72%	18.65%	+6.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.48%	19.73%	+3.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.48%	21.21%	+2.27%

TINT vs. FMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAT's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINT vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than FMAT's 1.47% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF	1.47%	1.64%	1.68%	1.71%	2.00%	1.44%	1.73%	1.89%	2.18%	1.53%	1.78%	2.16%
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	1.19%	1.27%	1.47%	0.99%	1.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINT and FMAT in my portfolio?

TINT and FMAT have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINT or FMAT?

TINT has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to FMAT (5.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs FMAT's -41.11%.

Which ETF is better, TINT or FMAT?

On 3-year performance, FMAT leads with 7.48% vs 4.82% for TINT. On fees, FMAT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINT or FMAT?

Over the 3-year period, FMAT has performed better with a 7.48% return vs 4.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINT or FMAT?

FMAT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for TINT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINT or FMAT?

FMAT has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.19% for TINT.

What is the main difference between TINT and FMAT?

TINT is categorized as Energy Equities, while FMAT is Materials. TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while FMAT tracks MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.08% for FMAT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.