TINT vs. CTEX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and CTEX (ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINT is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CTEX is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Kensho Cleantech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINT returned 10.87%/yr vs 18.14%/yr for CTEX. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.58% expense ratio.

Performance

TINT vs. CTEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 27.81% return, which is significantly lower than CTEX's 45.92% return.

TINT

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 6.42%
• YTD: 27.81%
• 6M: 29.05%
• 1Y: 48.89%
• 3Y*: 10.87%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTEX

• 1D: 8.17%
• 1M: 28.37%
• YTD: 45.92%
• 6M: 48.53%
• 1Y: 176.52%
• 3Y*: 18.14%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINT vs. CTEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	27.81%	16.13%	-13.37%	20.04%	-28.14%	1.71%
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	45.92%	67.74%	-20.38%	-10.25%	-20.38%	-18.23%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and CTEX is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.55
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021	0.64

The correlation between TINT and CTEX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

TINT vs. CTEX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINT	CTEX
Basic Materials	22.9%	-
Technology	10.9%	34.7%
Industrials	4.3%	48.9%
Financial Services	3.6%	-
Healthcare	2.2%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.8%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	3.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	11.5%

Return for Risk

TINT vs. CTEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINT

TINT Risk / Return Rank: 58
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 58
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 57

CTEX

CTEX Risk / Return Rank: 91
CTEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CTEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
CTEX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CTEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CTEX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINT vs. CTEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TINT	CTEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	4.22	-2.14
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	4.15	-1.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.53	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.80	7.97	-5.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.17	22.20	-12.03
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINT vs. CTEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINT Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is lower than the CTEX Sharpe Ratio of 4.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINT and CTEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TINT	CTEX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.08	4.22	-2.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.12	0.13	-0.02

Drawdowns

TINT vs. CTEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum CTEX drawdown of -70.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and CTEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINT	CTEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-70.31%	+28.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.53%	-21.62%	+4.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.42%	-56.83%	+26.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.16%	-41.97%	+20.81%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.83%	7.76%	-2.93%

Volatility

TINT vs. CTEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) is 11.50%, while ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF (CTEX) has a volatility of 14.96%. This indicates that TINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINT	CTEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.50%	14.96%	-3.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.78%	29.68%	-9.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.65%	42.13%	-18.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.46%	43.27%	-19.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.46%	43.27%	-19.81%

TINT vs. CTEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TINT and CTEX have an expense ratio of 0.58%.

Dividends

TINT vs. CTEX - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, less than CTEX's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CTEX ProShares S&P Kensho Cleantech ETF	1.43%	2.17%	0.57%	0.12%	0.00%
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	0.96%	1.27%	1.47%	0.99%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINT and CTEX in my portfolio?

TINT and CTEX have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINT or CTEX?

CTEX has higher volatility (14.96%) compared to TINT (11.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs CTEX's -70.31%.

Which ETF is better, TINT or CTEX?

On 3-year performance, CTEX leads with 18.14% vs 10.87% for TINT. Both ETFs have the same 0.58% expense ratio. On volatility, TINT has been the lower-risk option at 11.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINT or CTEX?

Over the 3-year period, CTEX has performed better with a 18.14% return vs 10.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINT or CTEX?

TINT and CTEX have the same expense ratio: 0.58% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINT or CTEX?

CTEX has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.96% for TINT.

What is the main difference between TINT and CTEX?

TINT is categorized as Energy Equities, while CTEX is Alternative Energy Equities. TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while CTEX tracks S&P Kensho Cleantech Index.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CTEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.22 vs 2.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.