TINT vs. INFR

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and INFR (ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - TINT tracks the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net while INFR tracks the RARE Global Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for INFR.

Performance

TINT vs. INFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

TINT

• 1D: -1.25%
• 1M: -8.31%
• 6M: 9.28%
• YTD: 15.25%
• 1Y: 22.79%
• 3Y*: 5.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

INFR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINT vs. INFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	15.25%	16.13%	-13.37%	20.04%	-1.80%
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.41%	24.00%	-6.23%	5.20%	-0.19%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and INFR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between TINT and INFR has dropped to 0.18 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

TINT vs. INFR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINT	INFR
Basic Materials	67.3%	-
Technology	21.0%	-
Industrials	7.0%	27.5%
Financial Services	3.9%	-
Healthcare	0.8%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	4.1%
Utilities	-	68.5%

Return for Risk

TINT vs. INFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINT

TINT Risk / Return Rank: 33
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 36

INFR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINT vs. INFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF (INFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINT	INFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.38	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	TINT	INFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.53%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.83%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.78%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.22%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TINT	INFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.63%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.32%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.53%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.52%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.52%	—	—

TINT vs. INFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than INFR's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINT vs. INFR - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, while INFR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
INFR ClearBridge Sustainable Infrastructure ETF	1.71%	2.52%	2.36%	3.06%	0.00%
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	1.19%	1.27%	1.47%	0.99%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINT and INFR in my portfolio?

TINT and INFR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TINT or INFR?

On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINT or INFR?

TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for INFR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINT or INFR?

INFR has the higher dividend yield at 1.71%, compared with 1.19% for TINT.

What is the main difference between TINT and INFR?

TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while INFR tracks RARE Global Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and ClearBridge. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.59% for INFR.