TINT vs. LITP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TINT (ProShares Smart Materials ETF) and LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - TINT tracks the Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net while LITP tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINT returned 10.12%/yr vs -0.12%/yr for LITP. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TINT charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for LITP.

Performance

TINT vs. LITP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINT achieves a 25.24% return, which is significantly lower than LITP's 28.96% return.

TINT

• 1D: -2.01%
• 1M: 9.06%
• YTD: 25.24%
• 6M: 25.40%
• 1Y: 44.33%
• 3Y*: 10.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LITP

• 1D: -4.66%
• 1M: -7.17%
• YTD: 28.96%
• 6M: 41.58%
• 1Y: 218.79%
• 3Y*: -0.12%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINT vs. LITP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	25.24%	16.13%	-13.37%	2.55%
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	28.96%	94.65%	-43.85%	-36.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TINT and LITP is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.41
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023	0.51

The correlation between TINT and LITP shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TINT vs. LITP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TINT	LITP
Basic Materials	22.9%	100.0%
Technology	10.9%	-
Industrials	4.3%	-
Financial Services	3.6%	-
Healthcare	2.2%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TINT vs. LITP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINT

TINT Risk / Return Rank: 54
TINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
TINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
TINT Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
TINT Martin Ratio Rank: 54

LITP

LITP Risk / Return Rank: 87
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 74
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINT vs. LITP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TINT	LITP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	3.78	-1.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.57	3.67	-1.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.45	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	7.08	-4.54
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.21	21.48	-12.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TINT vs. LITP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINT Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the LITP Sharpe Ratio of 3.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINT and LITP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TINT	LITP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	3.78	-1.90
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	-0.07	+0.16

Drawdowns

TINT vs. LITP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINT drawdown since its inception was -41.36%, smaller than the maximum LITP drawdown of -74.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINT and LITP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINT	LITP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.36%	-74.72%	+33.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.53%	-31.12%	+13.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.42%	-74.31%	+43.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.01%	-14.47%	+12.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.14%	-42.29%	+21.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.83%	10.23%	-5.40%

Volatility

TINT vs. LITP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Smart Materials ETF (TINT) is 10.66%, while Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that TINT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LITP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TINT	LITP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.66%	13.36%	-2.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.90%	39.69%	-19.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.75%	58.34%	-34.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.46%	47.34%	-23.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.46%	47.34%	-23.88%

TINT vs. LITP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINT has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is lower than LITP's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINT vs. LITP - Dividend Comparison

TINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than LITP's 5.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	5.74%	7.41%	6.55%	2.80%	0.00%
TINT ProShares Smart Materials ETF	0.98%	1.27%	1.47%	0.99%	1.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINT and LITP in my portfolio?

TINT and LITP have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TINT or LITP?

LITP has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to TINT (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TINT dropped -41.36% vs LITP's -74.72%.

Which ETF is better, TINT or LITP?

On 3-year performance, TINT leads with 10.12% vs -0.12% for LITP. On fees, TINT is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, TINT has been the lower-risk option at 10.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TINT or LITP?

Over the 3-year period, TINT has performed better with a 10.12% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINT or LITP?

TINT is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LITP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINT or LITP?

LITP has the higher dividend yield at 5.74%, compared with 0.98% for TINT.

What is the main difference between TINT and LITP?

TINT tracks Solactive Smart Materials Index - Benchmark TR Net, while LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for TINT and 0.65% for LITP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LITP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.78 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.