PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LITP vs. REMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

LITP vs. REMX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026
Documentation

LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) and REMX (VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LITP is a Lithium & Battery Metals fund tracking the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while REMX is a Rare Earth & Strategic Metals fund tracking the MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LITP returned -13.11%/yr vs -4.84%/yr for REMX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LITP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for REMX.

Performance

LITP vs. REMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a -17.54% return, which is significantly lower than REMX's -10.75% return.

LITP

1D
-1.30%
1M
-19.49%
6M
-23.27%
YTD
-17.54%
1Y
63.07%
3Y*
-13.11%
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
ALL TIME*
-14.86%

REMX

1D
-0.72%
1M
-23.93%
6M
-22.96%
YTD
-10.75%
1Y
36.09%
3Y*
-4.84%
5Y*
-7.48%
10Y*
5.76%
ALL TIME*
-5.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
$235.50K$292.96K$956.89K

REMX

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF
$50.08M$56.30M$87.87M

LITP vs. REMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF		-17.54%94.65%-43.85%-36.71%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF		-10.75%92.95%-35.02%-36.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LITP and REMX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2023

0.89

The correlation between LITP and REMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

LITP vs. REMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
LITP
REMX

Basic Materials

100.0%
100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Basic Materials

LITP
100.0%
REMX
100.0%

Communication Services

LITP

-

REMX

-

Consumer Cyclical

LITP

-

REMX

-

Consumer Defensive

LITP

-

REMX

-

Energy

LITP

-

REMX

-

Financial Services

LITP

-

REMX

-

Healthcare

LITP

-

REMX

-

Industrials

LITP

-

REMX

-

Real Estate

LITP

-

REMX

-

Technology

LITP

-

REMX

-

Utilities

LITP

-

REMX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF

Often compared with LITP:
LITP vs. ILITLITP vs. LITLITP vs. BATTLITP vs. LTLLITP vs. XMELITP vs. SQMLITP vs. ALB
Often compared with REMX:
REMX vs. LITREMX vs. XLBREMX vs. USARREMX vs. COPXREMX vs. RAREREMX vs. GNRREMX vs. WTRE

Return for Risk

LITP vs. REMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.
LITP
LITP Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
REMX
REMX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
REMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
REMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
REMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
REMX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LITP vs. REMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

LITPREMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.09
0.74

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.74
1.29

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.15

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.41

0.89

+0.52

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

2.75

+1.06

LITP vs. REMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the REMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and REMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LITP vs. REMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, smaller than the maximum REMX drawdown of -90.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and REMX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

LITPREMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.94%

-90.20%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-45.50%

-41.03%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.76%

-58.11%

-12.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-73.34%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-73.34%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.32%

-69.79%

+24.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-42.29%

-66.81%

+24.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.84%

13.28%

+3.56%

Volatility

LITP vs. REMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) is 10.66%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF (REMX) has a volatility of 11.77%. This indicates that LITP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

LITPREMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.66%

11.77%

-1.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.49%

37.31%

+3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.82%

49.87%

+8.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.58%

40.57%

+7.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.58%

37.30%

+10.28%

LITP vs. REMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than REMX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

LITP vs. REMX - Dividend Comparison

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.98%, more than REMX's 1.97% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF		8.98%7.41%6.55%2.80%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REMX
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals ETF		1.97%1.76%2.56%0.00%1.56%5.25%0.81%1.64%12.43%2.89%2.23%4.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

LITP and REMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REMX has higher volatility (11.77%) compared to LITP (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITP dropped -74.94% vs REMX's -90.20%.

On 3-year performance, REMX leads with -4.84% vs -13.11% for LITP. On fees, REMX is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, LITP has been the lower-risk option at 10.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, REMX has performed better with a -4.84% return vs -13.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REMX is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LITP.

LITP has the higher dividend yield at 8.98%, compared with 1.97% for REMX.

LITP is categorized as Lithium & Battery Metals, while REMX is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while REMX tracks MarketVector Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LITP and 0.59% for REMX.

LITP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.09 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LITP and REMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer