PortfoliosLab logo
LITP vs. XME
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LITP and XME is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LITP vs. XME - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LITP:

-1.03

XME:

-0.25

Sortino Ratio

LITP:

-1.64

XME:

-0.00

Omega Ratio

LITP:

0.83

XME:

1.00

Calmar Ratio

LITP:

-0.61

XME:

-0.13

Martin Ratio

LITP:

-1.33

XME:

-0.36

Ulcer Index

LITP:

34.37%

XME:

12.77%

Daily Std Dev

LITP:

44.97%

XME:

30.43%

Max Drawdown

LITP:

-74.72%

XME:

-85.94%

Current Drawdown

LITP:

-70.05%

XME:

-20.52%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a -16.47% return, which is significantly lower than XME's 5.18% return.


LITP

YTD

-16.47%

1M

5.78%

6M

-29.64%

1Y

-46.32%

3Y*

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XME

YTD

5.18%

1M

8.93%

6M

-10.79%

1Y

-7.64%

3Y*

6.89%

5Y*

25.30%

10Y*

9.48%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF

LITP vs. XME - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XME's 0.35% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LITP vs. XME — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LITP is 11
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LITP is 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LITP is 00
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LITP is 00
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LITP is 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LITP is 22
Martin Ratio Rank

XME
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XME is 1212
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XME is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XME is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XME is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XME is 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XME is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LITP vs. XME - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is -1.03, which is lower than the XME Sharpe Ratio of -0.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and XME, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LITP vs. XME - Dividend Comparison

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.85%, more than XME's 0.56% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
7.85%6.56%2.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XME
SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF
0.56%0.65%1.00%1.64%0.70%0.99%2.43%2.23%1.15%1.02%2.61%2.21%

Drawdowns

LITP vs. XME - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.72%, smaller than the maximum XME drawdown of -85.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and XME. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LITP vs. XME - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) at 5.25%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XME based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...