LITP vs. ILIT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

LITP (Sprott Lithium Miners ETF) and ILIT (Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF) are both Lithium & Battery Metals funds - LITP tracks the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross while ILIT tracks the STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LITP returned -4.35%/yr vs -5.16%/yr for ILIT. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LITP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for ILIT.

Performance

LITP vs. ILIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LITP achieves a 13.44% return, which is significantly lower than ILIT's 20.43% return.

LITP

• 1D: -3.66%
• 1M: -12.71%
• YTD: 13.44%
• 6M: 10.62%
• 1Y: 178.84%
• 3Y*: -4.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ILIT

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -6.71%
• YTD: 20.43%
• 6M: 20.23%
• 1Y: 160.57%
• 3Y*: -5.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LITP vs. ILIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	13.44%	94.65%	-43.85%	-30.89%
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF	20.43%	81.51%	-45.14%	-28.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LITP and ILIT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2023	0.91

The correlation between LITP and ILIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

LITP vs. ILIT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LITP	ILIT
Basic Materials	100.0%	85.0%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	10.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LITP vs. ILIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITP

LITP Risk / Return Rank: 81
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 67
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 82

ILIT

ILIT Risk / Return Rank: 86
ILIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ILIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
ILIT Omega Ratio Rank: 75
ILIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ILIT Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LITP vs. ILIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) and Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LITP	ILIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	3.20	-0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.18	3.47	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.42	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.78	6.06	-0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.96	17.10	-1.14

LITP vs. ILIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LITP Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the ILIT Sharpe Ratio of 3.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LITP and ILIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LITP vs. ILIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LITP drawdown since its inception was -74.94%, roughly equal to the maximum ILIT drawdown of -73.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LITP and ILIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LITP	ILIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.94%	-73.69%	-1.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.12%	-26.68%	-4.44%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-74.31%	-73.69%	-0.62%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.77%	-21.22%	-3.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-42.43%	-45.42%	+2.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.25%	9.43%	+1.82%

Volatility

LITP vs. ILIT - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP) has a higher volatility of 17.37% compared to Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF (ILIT) at 14.58%. This indicates that LITP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LITP	ILIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.37%	14.58%	+2.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	42.09%	35.02%	+7.07%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	60.22%	50.62%	+9.60%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.79%	41.97%	+5.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.79%	41.97%	+5.82%

LITP vs. ILIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LITP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ILIT's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

LITP vs. ILIT - Dividend Comparison

LITP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.53%, more than ILIT's 1.71% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ILIT Ishares Lithium Miners And Producers ETF	1.71%	2.27%	6.48%	0.69%
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	6.53%	7.41%	6.55%	2.80%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LITP and ILIT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, LITP and ILIT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LITP or ILIT?

LITP has higher volatility (17.37%) compared to ILIT (14.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LITP dropped -74.94% vs ILIT's -73.69%.

Which ETF is better, LITP or ILIT?

On 3-year performance, LITP leads with -4.35% vs -5.16% for ILIT. On fees, ILIT is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, ILIT has been the lower-risk option at 14.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LITP or ILIT?

Over the 3-year period, LITP has performed better with a -4.35% return vs -5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LITP or ILIT?

ILIT is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LITP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LITP or ILIT?

LITP has the higher dividend yield at 6.53%, compared with 1.71% for ILIT.

What is the main difference between LITP and ILIT?

LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while ILIT tracks STOXX Global Lithium Miners and Producers Index - USD - Benchmark TR Net. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LITP and 0.47% for ILIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ILIT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.20 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.