POW vs. SAPH
POW (VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF) and SAPH (ADRhedged SAP ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. Their -0.25 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. POW charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SAPH.
Performance
POW vs. SAPH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, POW achieves a 30.34% return, which is significantly higher than SAPH's -21.87% return.
POW
- 1D
- 6.39%
- 1M
- -17.26%
- 6M
- 12.11%
- YTD
- 30.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SAPH
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- 15.89%
- 6M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- -21.87%
- 1Y
- -35.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -22.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.18M | $2.23M | $3.08M | |
| $30.78K | $28.87K | $22.76K |
POW vs. SAPH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 30.34% | -1.70% |
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | -21.87% | -10.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between POW and SAPH is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | -0.25 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
POW vs. SAPH — Risk / Return Rank
POW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SAPH
POW vs. SAPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and ADRhedged SAP ETF (SAPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| POW | SAPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.83 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.24 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
POW vs. SAPH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -28.02%, smaller than the maximum SAPH drawdown of -51.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and SAPH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| POW | SAPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.02% | -51.72% | +23.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -47.02% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.42% | -41.42% | +18.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.43% | -23.15% | +17.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 29.13% | — |
Volatility
POW vs. SAPH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| POW | SAPH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.75% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 33.78% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.46% | 37.42% | -2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.46% | 35.53% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.46% | 35.53% | -1.07% |
POW vs. SAPH - Expense Ratio Comparison
POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SAPH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
POW vs. SAPH - Dividend Comparison
POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than SAPH's 3.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
POW VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF | 0.15% | 0.19% |
SAPH ADRhedged SAP ETF | 3.57% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
POW and SAPH have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SAPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SAPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.
SAPH has the higher dividend yield at 3.57%, compared with 0.15% for POW.
They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and ADRhedged. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.19% for SAPH.
Find the right allocation for POW and SAPH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer