PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
POW vs. SCUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

POW vs. SCUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


POW

1D
1.23%
1M
-4.96%
6M
39.30%
YTD
42.34%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCUB

1D
0.04%
1M
0.36%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

POW vs. SCUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between POW and SCUB is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2026

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

POW vs. SCUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Electrification Supercycle ETF (POW) and Sterling Capital Ultra Short Bond ETF (SCUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

POW vs. SCUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

POW vs. SCUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum POW drawdown since its inception was -17.41%, which is greater than SCUB's maximum drawdown of -0.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for POW and SCUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


POWSCUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-0.08%

-17.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.37%

0.00%

-16.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.18%

-0.01%

-4.17%

Volatility

POW vs. SCUB - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


POWSCUBDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.79%

0.79%

+32.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.79%

0.79%

+32.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.79%

0.79%

+32.00%

POW vs. SCUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

POW has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SCUB's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

POW vs. SCUB - Dividend Comparison

POW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SCUB's 1.33% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


POW and SCUB have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SCUB is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SCUB is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for POW.

SCUB has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.13% for POW.

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Sterling Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for POW and 0.30% for SCUB.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for POW and SCUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer