TINS vs. TCV

Last updated Jul 30, 2026

TINS (Templeton International Insights ETF) and TCV (Towle Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TINS is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton Investments, while TCV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Towle. Both are actively managed. Their 0.57 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TINS charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TCV.

Performance

TINS vs. TCV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINS achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than TCV's 27.04% return.

TINS

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: -1.65%
• 6M: 3.63%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

TCV

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: 1.82%
• 6M: 15.50%
• YTD: 27.04%
• 1Y: 33.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 29.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TCV Towle Value ETF	$910.76K	$643.64K	$380.38K
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	$1.04K	$769.30	$2.04K

TINS vs. TCV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	11.09%	3.11%
TCV Towle Value ETF	27.04%	-0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between TINS and TCV is 0.57, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025	0.57

Return for Risk

TINS vs. TCV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TINS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TCV

TCV Risk / Return Rank: 74
TCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
TCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
TCV Omega Ratio Rank: 68
TCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
TCV Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TINS vs. TCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton International Insights ETF (TINS) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TINS	TCV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.29	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.74	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	8.79	—

Drawdowns

TINS vs. TCV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINS drawdown since its inception was -10.79%, smaller than the maximum TCV drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINS and TCV.

Drawdown Indicators

	TINS	TCV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.79%	-12.23%	+1.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.82%	-2.57%	-1.25%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.22%	-3.23%	+1.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	TINS	TCV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.69%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.66%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.31%	20.70%	-3.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.31%	21.07%	-3.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.31%	21.07%	-3.76%

TINS vs. TCV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TINS has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than TCV's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

TINS vs. TCV - Dividend Comparison

TINS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than TCV's 0.57% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
TCV Towle Value ETF	0.57%	0.31%
TINS Templeton International Insights ETF	0.21%	0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TINS and TCV in my portfolio?

TINS and TCV have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TINS or TCV?

On fees, TINS is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TINS or TCV?

TINS is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TINS or TCV?

TCV has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.21% for TINS.

What is the main difference between TINS and TCV?

TINS is categorized as Actively Managed, while TCV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton Investments and Towle. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for TINS and 0.85% for TCV.