PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILT vs. FEDM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILT vs. FEDM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILT achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than FEDM's 6.03% return.


TILT

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.39%
YTD
10.68%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
13.96%

FEDM

1D
-0.91%
1M
3.29%
YTD
6.03%
6M
8.22%
1Y
16.39%
3Y*
13.99%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILT vs. FEDM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
10.68%16.59%19.88%24.70%-17.25%8.39%
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
6.03%26.85%2.85%17.39%-15.25%1.87%

Correlation

The correlation between TILT and FEDM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2021

0.77

The correlation between TILT and FEDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

TILT vs. FEDM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TILT
FEDM

Technology

27.2%
10.9%

Financial Services

16.0%
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
5.7%

Industrials

10.1%
17.8%

Healthcare

9.4%
10.0%

Communication Services

8.6%
4.6%

Energy

4.8%
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
7.1%

Real Estate

3.1%
1.8%

Basic Materials

2.7%
5.9%

Utilities

2.4%
3.5%

Technology

TILT
27.2%
FEDM
10.9%

Financial Services

TILT
16.0%
FEDM
27.1%

Consumer Cyclical

TILT
10.9%
FEDM
5.7%

Industrials

TILT
10.1%
FEDM
17.8%

Healthcare

TILT
9.4%
FEDM
10.0%

Communication Services

TILT
8.6%
FEDM
4.6%

Energy

TILT
4.8%
FEDM
5.7%

Consumer Defensive

TILT
4.7%
FEDM
7.1%

Real Estate

TILT
3.1%
FEDM
1.8%

Basic Materials

TILT
2.7%
FEDM
5.9%

Utilities

TILT
2.4%
FEDM
3.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILT vs. FEDM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILT
TILT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FEDM
FEDM Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FEDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FEDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FEDM Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FEDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FEDM Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILT vs. FEDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILTFEDMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.19

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

1.38

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

4.97

+9.74

TILT vs. FEDM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILT Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the FEDM Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILT and FEDM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILTFEDMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.02

+1.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.46

+0.38

Drawdowns

TILT vs. FEDM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILT drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than FEDM's maximum drawdown of -29.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILT and FEDM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILTFEDMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-29.37%

-9.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-11.92%

+3.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.85%

-14.24%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

-2.01%

+1.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-6.99%

+2.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.30%

-1.36%

Volatility

TILT vs. FEDM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) is 3.04%, while FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund (FEDM) has a volatility of 4.78%. This indicates that TILT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILTFEDMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

4.78%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

12.44%

-3.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

16.14%

-3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

16.46%

+0.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

16.46%

+2.29%

TILT vs. FEDM - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FEDM's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TILT vs. FEDM - Dividend Comparison

TILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, less than FEDM's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FEDM
FlexShares ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index Fund
2.82%2.97%2.94%2.61%2.53%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
1.07%1.15%1.23%1.44%1.60%1.16%1.49%1.54%1.97%1.55%1.60%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILT and FEDM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FEDM has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to TILT (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILT dropped -38.46% vs FEDM's -29.37%.

On 3-year performance, TILT leads with 20.80% vs 13.99% for FEDM. On fees, FEDM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, TILT has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TILT has performed better with a 20.80% return vs 13.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FEDM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TILT.

FEDM has the higher dividend yield at 2.82%, compared with 1.07% for TILT.

TILT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FEDM is Foreign Large Cap Equities. TILT tracks Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index, while FEDM tracks Northern Trust ESG & Climate Developed Markets ex-US Core Index - Benchmark TR Net. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TILT and 0.12% for FEDM.

TILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILT and FEDM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer