PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILT vs. FV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILT vs. FV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILT achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly lower than FV's 18.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TILT having a 13.96% annualized return and FV not far behind at 13.45%.


TILT

1D
-0.67%
1M
4.39%
YTD
10.68%
6M
10.81%
1Y
28.46%
3Y*
20.80%
5Y*
11.59%
10Y*
13.96%

FV

1D
1.48%
1M
11.69%
YTD
18.14%
6M
18.84%
1Y
28.90%
3Y*
18.88%
5Y*
10.37%
10Y*
13.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILT vs. FV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
10.68%16.59%19.88%24.70%-17.25%27.61%16.05%29.01%-8.93%18.33%
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
18.14%7.23%14.73%11.34%-3.93%21.63%28.36%25.73%-8.27%19.97%

Correlation

The correlation between TILT and FV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2014

0.86

The correlation between TILT and FV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

TILT vs. FV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TILT
FV

Technology

27.2%
29.0%

Financial Services

16.0%
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
6.4%

Industrials

10.1%
27.8%

Healthcare

9.4%
19.4%

Communication Services

8.6%
6.3%

Energy

4.8%
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%

-

Real Estate

3.1%
0.7%

Basic Materials

2.7%

-

Utilities

2.4%

-

Technology

TILT
27.2%
FV
29.0%

Financial Services

TILT
16.0%
FV
19.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TILT
10.9%
FV
6.4%

Industrials

TILT
10.1%
FV
27.8%

Healthcare

TILT
9.4%
FV
19.4%

Communication Services

TILT
8.6%
FV
6.3%

Energy

TILT
4.8%
FV
17.5%

Consumer Defensive

TILT
4.7%
FV

-

Real Estate

TILT
3.1%
FV
0.7%

Basic Materials

TILT
2.7%
FV

-

Utilities

TILT
2.4%
FV

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILT vs. FV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILT
TILT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TILT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILT Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
TILT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILT Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

FV
FV Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
FV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FV Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FV Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FV Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILT vs. FV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) and First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILTFVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.33

1.91

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.22

2.62

+0.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.33

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.36

2.16

+1.20

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.71

8.12

+6.60

TILT vs. FV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILT Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FV Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILT and FV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILTFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

1.91

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.50

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.63

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.83

0.58

+0.25

Drawdowns

TILT vs. FV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILT drawdown since its inception was -38.46%, which is greater than FV's maximum drawdown of -34.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILT and FV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILTFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.46%

-34.04%

-4.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-13.45%

+4.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.85%

-23.08%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.12%

-23.08%

-1.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.46%

-34.04%

-4.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.67%

0.00%

-0.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-5.80%

+1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

3.57%

-1.63%

Volatility

TILT vs. FV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund (TILT) is 3.04%, while First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF (FV) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that TILT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILTFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

4.25%

-1.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

12.54%

-3.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.29%

15.22%

-2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.39%

20.76%

-3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.75%

21.42%

-2.67%

TILT vs. FV - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILT has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FV's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILT vs. FV - Dividend Comparison

TILT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than FV's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FV
First Trust Dorsey Wright Focus 5 ETF
0.52%0.63%0.14%0.47%1.38%0.11%0.06%0.56%0.19%0.67%0.95%0.14%
TILT
FlexShares Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index Fund
1.07%1.15%1.23%1.44%1.60%1.16%1.49%1.54%1.97%1.55%1.60%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILT and FV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FV has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to TILT (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILT dropped -38.46% vs FV's -34.04%.

On 10-year performance, TILT leads with 13.96% vs 13.45% for FV. On fees, TILT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TILT has been the lower-risk option at 3.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TILT has performed better with a 13.96% return vs 13.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TILT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for FV.

TILT has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.52% for FV.

TILT is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FV is Large Cap Growth Equities. TILT tracks Morningstar US Market Factor Tilt Index, while FV tracks Dorsey Wright Focus Five Index. They also come from different issuers: FlexShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TILT and 0.87% for FV.

TILT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILT and FV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer