PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SOYB vs. WEAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SOYB vs. WEAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly lower than WEAT's 13.92% return. Over the past 10 years, SOYB has outperformed WEAT with an annualized return of 1.80%, while WEAT has yielded a comparatively lower -6.15% annualized return.


SOYB

1D
0.29%
1M
-2.87%
YTD
11.34%
6M
9.94%
1Y
8.71%
3Y*
-3.47%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
1.80%

WEAT

1D
-0.83%
1M
-7.33%
YTD
13.92%
6M
12.62%
1Y
-5.21%
3Y*
-14.30%
5Y*
-7.11%
10Y*
-6.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SOYB vs. WEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SOYB
Teucrium Soybean Fund
11.34%1.77%-20.48%-5.23%25.27%16.85%22.99%-2.16%-9.51%-6.38%
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
13.92%-17.14%-19.26%-25.19%7.98%19.39%5.81%-1.35%-1.17%-12.79%

Correlation

The correlation between SOYB and WEAT is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.40

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2011

0.40

The correlation between SOYB and WEAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (10 years) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SOYB vs. WEAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SOYB
SOYB Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
SOYB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SOYB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SOYB Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SOYB Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
SOYB Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

WEAT
WEAT Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
WEAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WEAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
WEAT Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
WEAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
WEAT Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SOYB vs. WEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SOYBWEATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

0.98

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

-0.34

+1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.56

-0.54

+3.10

SOYB vs. WEAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SOYB Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is higher than the WEAT Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SOYB and WEAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SOYB vs. WEAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, smaller than the maximum WEAT drawdown of -84.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and WEAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SOYBWEATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.76%

-84.32%

+30.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.78%

-15.58%

+6.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.01%

-46.27%

+15.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.01%

-67.83%

+36.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.49%

-67.83%

+30.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.96%

-82.05%

+65.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.73%

-63.17%

+37.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

10.96%

-7.45%

Volatility

SOYB vs. WEAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) is 3.09%, while Teucrium Wheat Fund (WEAT) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that SOYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SOYBWEATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

4.91%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.94%

18.10%

-9.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

22.00%

-9.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.54%

30.44%

-12.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.93%

26.78%

-9.85%

SOYB vs. WEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SOYB has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is lower than WEAT's 1.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

SOYB vs. WEAT - Dividend Comparison

Neither SOYB nor WEAT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SOYB and WEAT have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WEAT has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to SOYB (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOYB dropped -53.76% vs WEAT's -84.32%.

On 10-year performance, SOYB leads with 1.80% vs -6.15% for WEAT. On fees, SOYB is cheaper at 1.88% per year. On volatility, SOYB has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SOYB has performed better with a 1.80% return vs -6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SOYB is cheaper with a 1.88% expense ratio, compared with 1.91% for WEAT.

SOYB and WEAT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

SOYB tracks Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while WEAT tracks Teucrium Wheat Fund Benchmark. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for SOYB and 1.91% for WEAT.

SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SOYB and WEAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer