SOYB vs. TAGS
SOYB (Teucrium Soybean Fund) and TAGS (Teucrium Agricultural Fund) are both Agricultural Commodities funds from Teucrium - SOYB tracks the Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark while TAGS tracks the Teucrium TAGS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SOYB returned 1.80%/yr vs -1.83%/yr for TAGS. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SOYB charges 1.88%/yr vs 0.21%/yr for TAGS.
Performance
SOYB vs. TAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SOYB achieves a 11.34% return, which is significantly higher than TAGS's 3.75% return. Over the past 10 years, SOYB has outperformed TAGS with an annualized return of 1.80%, while TAGS has yielded a comparatively lower -1.83% annualized return.
SOYB
- 1D
- 0.29%
- 1M
- -2.87%
- YTD
- 11.34%
- 6M
- 9.94%
- 1Y
- 8.71%
- 3Y*
- -3.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.75%
- 10Y*
- 1.80%
TAGS
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- -6.05%
- YTD
- 3.75%
- 6M
- 3.20%
- 1Y
- -4.97%
- 3Y*
- -10.09%
- 5Y*
- -0.79%
- 10Y*
- -1.83%
SOYB vs. TAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SOYB Teucrium Soybean Fund | 11.34% | 1.77% | -20.48% | -5.23% | 25.27% | 16.85% | 22.99% | -2.16% | -9.51% | -6.38% |
TAGS Teucrium Agricultural Fund | 3.75% | -8.76% | -14.57% | -6.11% | 16.25% | 27.05% | 8.19% | -4.53% | -7.10% | -13.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between SOYB and TAGS is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2012 | 0.41 |
Over the past year, SOYB and TAGS have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.41, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SOYB vs. TAGS — Risk / Return Rank
SOYB
TAGS
SOYB vs. TAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) and Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SOYB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.95 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | -0.54 | +1.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | -0.96 | +3.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SOYB vs. TAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SOYB drawdown since its inception was -53.76%, smaller than the maximum TAGS drawdown of -76.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SOYB and TAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SOYB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.76% | -76.40% | +22.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.78% | -9.30% | +0.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.01% | -32.73% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.01% | -37.60% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.49% | -44.72% | +7.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.96% | -64.50% | +47.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.73% | -57.23% | +31.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.51% | 5.99% | -2.48% |
Volatility
SOYB vs. TAGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Teucrium Soybean Fund (SOYB) is 3.09%, while Teucrium Agricultural Fund (TAGS) has a volatility of 3.30%. This indicates that SOYB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SOYB | TAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 3.30% | -0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.94% | 10.31% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 12.70% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 16.33% | +1.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.93% | 18.00% | -1.07% |
SOYB vs. TAGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
SOYB has a 1.88% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGS's 0.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
SOYB vs. TAGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither SOYB nor TAGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SOYB and TAGS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TAGS has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to SOYB (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SOYB dropped -53.76% vs TAGS's -76.40%.
On 10-year performance, SOYB leads with 1.80% vs -1.83% for TAGS. On fees, TAGS is cheaper at 0.21% per year. On volatility, SOYB has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SOYB has performed better with a 1.80% return vs -1.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TAGS is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 1.88% for SOYB.
SOYB and TAGS have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
SOYB tracks Teucrium Soybean Fund Benchmark, while TAGS tracks Teucrium TAGS Index. Their fees differ too: 1.88% for SOYB and 0.21% for TAGS.
SOYB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SOYB and TAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer