TILL vs. FLUD
TILL (Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF) and FLUD (Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TILL is a Commodities fund actively managed by Teucrium, while FLUD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TILL returned -5.74%/yr vs 5.31%/yr for FLUD. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. TILL charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLUD.
Performance
TILL vs. FLUD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly higher than FLUD's 1.48% return.
TILL
- 1D
- -1.13%
- 1M
- -6.31%
- YTD
- 5.10%
- 6M
- 3.12%
- 1Y
- -1.33%
- 3Y*
- -5.74%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLUD
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.31%
- 5Y*
- 3.62%
- 10Y*
- —
TILL vs. FLUD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 5.10% | -5.97% | -13.98% | -5.00% | -12.66% |
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 1.48% | 5.36% | 5.44% | 5.95% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TILL and FLUD is -0.23, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022 | -0.07 |
The correlation between TILL and FLUD shifts across timeframes, from -0.23 (1 year) to -0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TILL vs. FLUD — Risk / Return Rank
TILL
FLUD
TILL vs. FLUD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TILL | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.59 | -0.60 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 10.48 | -10.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.25 | 41.70 | -41.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TILL | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 2.73 | -2.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 2.72 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.56 | 2.58 | -3.15 |
Drawdowns
TILL vs. FLUD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than FLUD's maximum drawdown of -1.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and FLUD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TILL | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.76% | -1.66% | -32.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.98% | -0.44% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.40% | -0.59% | -29.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -1.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.47% | -0.05% | -29.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.40% | -0.24% | -21.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 0.11% | +5.30% |
Volatility
TILL vs. FLUD - Volatility Comparison
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) at 0.34%. This indicates that TILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLUD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TILL | FLUD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 0.34% | +5.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 0.74% | +9.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.68% | 1.68% | +11.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 1.34% | +13.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.74% | 1.26% | +13.48% |
TILL vs. FLUD - Expense Ratio Comparison
TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than FLUD's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
TILL vs. FLUD - Dividend Comparison
TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than FLUD's 4.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLUD Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF | 4.27% | 4.51% | 4.97% | 4.72% | 1.39% | 0.92% | 0.93% |
TILL Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF | 4.72% | 4.97% | 2.55% | 51.24% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TILL and FLUD have a correlation of -0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TILL has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to FLUD (0.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs FLUD's -1.66%.
On 3-year performance, FLUD leads with 5.31% vs -5.74% for TILL. On fees, FLUD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLUD has been the lower-risk option at 0.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FLUD has performed better with a 5.31% return vs -5.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLUD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.
TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 4.27% for FLUD.
TILL is categorized as Commodities, while FLUD is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.15% for FLUD.
FLUD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TILL and FLUD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer