PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FLUD vs. FLCB
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FLUD vs. FLCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FLUD vs. FLCB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
0.85%5.36%5.44%5.95%0.16%0.09%0.77%
FLCB
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
0.08%6.95%1.59%5.72%-13.54%-1.73%1.03%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FLUD achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly higher than FLCB's 0.08% return.


FLUD

1D
0.18%
1M
0.28%
YTD
0.85%
6M
1.80%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5.48%
5Y*
3.50%
10Y*

FLCB

1D
0.03%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
0.08%
6M
0.76%
1Y
4.00%
3Y*
3.67%
5Y*
0.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FLUD vs. FLCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FLUD and FLCB have an expense ratio of 0.15%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

FLUD vs. FLCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FLUD
FLUD Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
FLUD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLUD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLUD Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLUD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLUD Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

FLCB
FLCB Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FLCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLCB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FLCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLCB Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FLUD vs. FLCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) and Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FLUDFLCBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.72

0.93

+1.78

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.29

1.32

+2.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.17

+0.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.72

1.66

+9.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

39.75

4.63

+35.11

FLUD vs. FLCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FLUD Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the FLCB Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FLUD and FLCB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FLUDFLCBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

0.93

+1.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.66

0.02

+2.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.56

0.16

+2.40

Correlation

The correlation between FLUD and FLCB is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FLUD vs. FLCB - Dividend Comparison

FLUD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than FLCB's 4.23% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
FLUD
Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF
4.43%4.51%4.97%4.72%1.39%0.92%0.93%0.00%
FLCB
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
4.23%4.19%4.10%3.40%2.73%2.28%3.24%0.73%

Drawdowns

FLUD vs. FLCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FLUD drawdown since its inception was -1.66%, smaller than the maximum FLCB drawdown of -18.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLUD and FLCB.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FLUDFLCBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.66%

-18.82%

+17.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.44%

-2.57%

+2.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.66%

-18.48%

+16.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.54%

+2.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.25%

-6.74%

+6.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

0.93%

-0.81%

Volatility

FLUD vs. FLCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Franklin Ultra Short Bond ETF (FLUD) is 0.42%, while Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF (FLCB) has a volatility of 1.71%. This indicates that FLUD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FLUDFLCBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.42%

1.71%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.13%

2.60%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.74%

4.31%

-2.57%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.33%

5.72%

-4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.27%

5.54%

-4.27%