PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILL vs. BSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILL vs. BSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILL achieves a 3.18% return, which is significantly higher than BSSX's 1.04% return.


TILL

1D
-0.89%
1M
-7.23%
YTD
3.18%
6M
2.69%
1Y
-4.74%
3Y*
-8.81%
5Y*
10Y*

BSSX

1D
-0.10%
1M
1.44%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.36%
1Y
6.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILL vs. BSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TILL
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF
3.18%-5.97%-13.98%-4.37%
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
1.04%3.79%-0.09%7.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TILL and BSSX is -0.20, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

-0.05

The correlation between TILL and BSSX shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILL vs. BSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILL
TILL Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TILL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILL Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILL Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TILL Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILL Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

BSSX
BSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
BSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
BSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILL vs. BSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) and Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TILLBSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.43

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.50

2.09

-2.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

6.39

-7.36

TILL vs. BSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILL Sharpe Ratio is -0.38, which is lower than the BSSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILL and BSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TILL vs. BSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILL drawdown since its inception was -33.76%, which is greater than BSSX's maximum drawdown of -8.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILL and BSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILLBSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.76%

-8.12%

-25.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.46%

-3.28%

-6.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-30.76%

-0.98%

-29.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.47%

-3.22%

-18.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.63%

1.07%

+4.56%

Volatility

TILL vs. BSSX - Volatility Comparison

Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF (TILL) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) at 0.93%. This indicates that TILL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILLBSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

0.93%

+1.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.35%

2.38%

+7.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.67%

3.31%

+9.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.70%

7.77%

+6.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.70%

7.77%

+6.93%

TILL vs. BSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILL has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than BSSX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILL vs. BSSX - Dividend Comparison

TILL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than BSSX's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
3.59%3.27%3.29%0.95%0.00%
TILL
Teucrium Agricultural Strategy No K-1 ETF
4.81%4.97%2.55%51.24%0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILL and BSSX have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILL has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to BSSX (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILL dropped -33.76% vs BSSX's -8.12%.

On 1-year performance, BSSX leads with 6.84% vs -4.74% for TILL. On fees, BSSX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSSX has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BSSX has performed better with a 6.84% return vs -4.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSSX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for TILL.

TILL has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 3.59% for BSSX.

TILL is categorized as Commodities, while BSSX is Municipal Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Teucrium and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for TILL and 0.18% for BSSX.

BSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs -0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILL and BSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer