PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BSSX vs. OVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BSSX vs. OVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BSSX achieves a 1.09% return, which is significantly lower than OVM's 3.51% return.


BSSX

1D
0.05%
1M
1.49%
YTD
1.09%
6M
1.35%
1Y
6.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OVM

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.91%
YTD
3.51%
6M
3.37%
1Y
10.31%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
1.46%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BSSX vs. OVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
1.09%3.79%-0.09%7.50%
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
3.51%4.14%3.42%4.95%

Correlation

The correlation between BSSX and OVM is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2023

0.48

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BSSX vs. OVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSSX
BSSX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
BSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
BSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

OVM
OVM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
OVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
OVM Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
OVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
OVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BSSX vs. OVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) and Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BSSXOVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.48

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

4.25

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.33

16.03

-9.70

BSSX vs. OVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BSSX Sharpe Ratio is 2.06, which is comparable to the OVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BSSX and OVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BSSX vs. OVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BSSX drawdown since its inception was -8.12%, smaller than the maximum OVM drawdown of -15.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BSSX and OVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BSSXOVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.12%

-15.58%

+7.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.28%

-2.44%

-0.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.93%

-0.66%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-3.98%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.07%

0.64%

+0.43%

Volatility

BSSX vs. OVM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF (BSSX) is 0.92%, while Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF (OVM) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that BSSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BSSXOVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.92%

1.47%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.38%

3.48%

-1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.31%

4.27%

-0.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.76%

5.42%

+2.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.76%

6.54%

+1.22%

BSSX vs. OVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

BSSX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than OVM's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

BSSX vs. OVM - Dividend Comparison

BSSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, less than OVM's 6.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BSSX
Invesco BulletShares 2033 Municipal Bond ETF
3.30%3.27%3.29%0.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OVM
Overlay Shares Municipal Bond ETF
6.14%5.45%4.91%4.66%4.21%6.10%3.97%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


BSSX and OVM have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OVM has higher volatility (1.47%) compared to BSSX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BSSX dropped -8.12% vs OVM's -15.58%.

On 1-year performance, OVM leads with 10.31% vs 6.78% for BSSX. On fees, BSSX is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSSX has been the lower-risk option at 0.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, OVM has performed better with a 10.31% return vs 6.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSSX is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for OVM.

OVM has the higher dividend yield at 6.14%, compared with 3.30% for BSSX.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Liquid Strategies. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for BSSX and 0.82% for OVM.

OVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BSSX and OVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer