PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRW vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGRW vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRW achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 20.26% return.


TGRW

1D
1.18%
1M
-2.97%
6M
2.03%
YTD
-0.41%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.68%

XOMO

1D
-1.31%
1M
10.95%
6M
6.18%
YTD
20.26%
1Y
29.93%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$159.62K$239.67K$596.13K
$613.93K$674.71K$709.58K

TGRW vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
-0.41%15.62%29.94%7.40%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
20.26%6.90%6.11%-8.59%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRW and XOMO is -0.31, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.31

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2023

-0.11

The correlation between TGRW and XOMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.31 (1 year) to -0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGRW vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGRW
TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGRW vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGRWXOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.25

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

1.64

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

4.12

-3.27

TGRW vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRW and XOMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGRW vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRW drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, which is greater than XOMO's maximum drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRW and XOMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRWXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.33%

-18.90%

-24.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-17.25%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.58%

-7.57%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-7.50%

-4.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

6.90%

-0.47%

Volatility

TGRW vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) is 5.82%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.19%. This indicates that TGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRWXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

6.19%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

17.25%

-2.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

20.68%

-2.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

19.20%

+4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

19.20%

+3.79%

TGRW vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRW has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGRW vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XOMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 37.04%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.40%0.21%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
37.04%31.64%26.94%5.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGRW and XOMO have a correlation of -0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOMO has higher volatility (6.19%) compared to TGRW (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRW dropped -43.33% vs XOMO's -18.90%.

On 1-year performance, XOMO leads with 29.93% vs 8.07% for TGRW. On fees, TGRW is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, TGRW has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XOMO has performed better with a 29.93% return vs 8.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TGRW is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO has the higher dividend yield at 37.04%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.

TGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XOMO is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TGRW and 1.01% for XOMO.

XOMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRW and XOMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer