PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRW vs. TGRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGRW vs. TGRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRW achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than TGRT's 1.18% return.


TGRW

1D
1.18%
1M
-2.97%
6M
2.03%
YTD
-0.41%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.68%

TGRT

1D
0.70%
1M
-1.08%
6M
3.42%
YTD
1.18%
1Y
10.30%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$4.26M$3.99M$7.47M
$159.62K$239.67K$596.13K

TGRW vs. TGRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
-0.41%15.62%29.94%13.40%
TGRT
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
1.18%16.94%32.85%13.15%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRW and TGRT is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2023

0.98

The correlation between TGRW and TGRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

TGRW vs. TGRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TGRW
TGRT

Technology

51.7%
53.5%

Communication Services

18.3%
15.8%

Industrials

8.3%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
7.6%

Healthcare

6.5%
8.5%

Financial Services

5.5%
5.9%

Real Estate

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

0.6%
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
1.0%

Energy

-

0.2%

Utilities

-

0.5%

Technology

TGRW
51.7%
TGRT
53.5%

Communication Services

TGRW
18.3%
TGRT
15.8%

Industrials

TGRW
8.3%
TGRT
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

TGRW
8.3%
TGRT
7.6%

Healthcare

TGRW
6.5%
TGRT
8.5%

Financial Services

TGRW
5.5%
TGRT
5.9%

Real Estate

TGRW
0.6%
TGRT

-

Basic Materials

TGRW
0.6%
TGRT
0.2%

Consumer Defensive

TGRW
0.2%
TGRT
1.0%

Energy

TGRW

-

TGRT
0.2%

Utilities

TGRW

-

TGRT
0.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGRW vs. TGRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGRW
TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

TGRT
TGRT Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TGRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRT Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRT Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGRW vs. TGRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGRWTGRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.09

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

0.44

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

1.36

-0.51

TGRW vs. TGRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the TGRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRW and TGRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGRW vs. TGRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRW drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, which is greater than TGRT's maximum drawdown of -22.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRW and TGRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRWTGRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.33%

-22.04%

-21.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-17.89%

-0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.18%

-22.04%

-1.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.58%

-5.79%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-3.36%

-8.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

5.82%

+0.61%

Volatility

TGRW vs. TGRT - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to T. Rowe Price Growth ETF (TGRT) at 5.11%. This indicates that TGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRWTGRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

5.11%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

14.20%

+0.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

17.66%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

19.20%

+4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

19.20%

+3.79%

TGRW vs. TGRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRW has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than TGRT's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGRW vs. TGRT - Dividend Comparison

TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TGRT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
TGRT
T. Rowe Price Growth ETF
0.08%0.08%0.09%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.40%0.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, TGRW and TGRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TGRW has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to TGRT (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRW dropped -43.33% vs TGRT's -22.04%.

On 3-year performance, TGRT leads with 19.48% vs 17.00% for TGRW. On fees, TGRT is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, TGRT has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, TGRT has performed better with a 19.48% return vs 17.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TGRT is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.

TGRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.

Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TGRW and 0.38% for TGRT.

TGRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRW and TGRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer