PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRW vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGRW vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRW achieves a -0.41% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 12.26% return.


TGRW

1D
1.18%
1M
-2.97%
6M
2.03%
YTD
-0.41%
1Y
8.07%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
6.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.68%

QQQ

1D
0.65%
1M
-3.45%
6M
10.89%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.81%
3Y*
22.29%
5Y*
14.23%
10Y*
20.44%
ALL TIME*
10.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$30.32B$28.40B$31.45B
$159.62K$239.67K$596.13K

TGRW vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
-0.41%15.62%29.94%48.87%-38.42%14.97%16.40%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
12.26%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%16.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRW and QQQ is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020

0.96

The correlation between TGRW and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

TGRW vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TGRW
QQQ

Technology

51.7%
60.9%

Communication Services

18.3%
13.1%

Industrials

8.3%
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.3%
10.7%

Healthcare

6.5%
3.6%

Financial Services

5.5%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.6%
0.1%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

0.2%
6.3%

Energy

-

0.5%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Technology

TGRW
51.7%
QQQ
60.9%

Communication Services

TGRW
18.3%
QQQ
13.1%

Industrials

TGRW
8.3%
QQQ
2.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TGRW
8.3%
QQQ
10.7%

Healthcare

TGRW
6.5%
QQQ
3.6%

Financial Services

TGRW
5.5%
QQQ
0.2%

Real Estate

TGRW
0.6%
QQQ
0.1%

Basic Materials

TGRW
0.6%
QQQ
1.0%

Consumer Defensive

TGRW
0.2%
QQQ
6.3%

Energy

TGRW

-

QQQ
0.5%

Utilities

TGRW

-

QQQ
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGRW vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGRW
TGRW Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
TGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGRW vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGRWQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.21

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

1.88

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

6.00

-5.14

TGRW vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRW and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGRW vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRW drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRW and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRWQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.33%

-82.97%

+39.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-11.96%

-6.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.18%

-22.77%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.33%

-35.12%

-8.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.58%

-7.69%

+0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.29%

-32.62%

+20.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.43%

3.74%

+2.69%

Volatility

TGRW vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) is 5.82%, while Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) has a volatility of 6.87%. This indicates that TGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRWQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.82%

6.87%

-1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.41%

16.08%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.24%

19.38%

-1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.49%

22.90%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.99%

22.50%

+0.49%

TGRW vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRW has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGRW vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.44%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%
TGRW
T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.00%0.40%0.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, TGRW and QQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QQQ has higher volatility (6.87%) compared to TGRW (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRW dropped -43.33% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 5-year performance, QQQ leads with 14.23% vs 6.77% for TGRW. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, TGRW has been the lower-risk option at 5.82%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 14.23% return vs 6.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.

QQQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.

TGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TGRW and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.16 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRW and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer