TGRW vs. SPYG
TGRW (T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF) and SPYG (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while SPYG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Growth Index. TGRW is actively managed, while SPYG is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TGRW returned 7.54%/yr vs 14.11%/yr for SPYG. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TGRW charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SPYG.
Performance
TGRW vs. SPYG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGRW achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than SPYG's 8.70% return.
TGRW
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- 0.74%
- 6M
- -0.34%
- 1Y
- 15.30%
- 3Y*
- 19.72%
- 5Y*
- 7.54%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYG
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- 8.70%
- 6M
- 7.46%
- 1Y
- 26.87%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 14.11%
- 10Y*
- 18.05%
TGRW vs. SPYG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.74% | 15.62% | 29.94% | 48.87% | -38.42% | 14.97% | 16.40% |
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 8.70% | 22.09% | 35.99% | 30.02% | -29.41% | 32.01% | 13.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGRW and SPYG is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2020 | 0.96 |
The correlation between TGRW and SPYG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
TGRW vs. SPYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TGRW
SPYG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
TGRW
SPYG
Communication Services
TGRW
SPYG
Consumer Cyclical
TGRW
SPYG
Healthcare
TGRW
SPYG
Financial Services
TGRW
SPYG
Industrials
TGRW
SPYG
Consumer Defensive
TGRW
SPYG
Basic Materials
TGRW
SPYG
Real Estate
TGRW
SPYG
Energy
TGRW
-
SPYG
Utilities
TGRW
-
SPYG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGRW vs. SPYG — Risk / Return Rank
TGRW
SPYG
TGRW vs. SPYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGRW | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.68 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.28 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.96 | -1.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.53 | 7.79 | -5.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGRW vs. SPYG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGRW drawdown since its inception was -43.33%, smaller than the maximum SPYG drawdown of -67.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRW and SPYG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGRW | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.33% | -67.63% | +24.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.84% | -13.76% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.18% | -22.14% | -1.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.33% | -32.67% | -10.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -32.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.51% | -5.52% | -0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.40% | -24.28% | +11.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.05% | 3.46% | +2.59% |
Volatility
TGRW vs. SPYG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF (TGRW) is 6.40%, while State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF (SPYG) has a volatility of 7.26%. This indicates that TGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGRW | SPYG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 7.26% | -0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.54% | 13.90% | -0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.40% | 17.26% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.40% | 21.36% | +2.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.04% | 20.73% | +2.31% |
TGRW vs. SPYG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGRW has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGRW vs. SPYG - Dividend Comparison
TGRW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYG State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Growth ETF | 0.50% | 0.52% | 0.60% | 1.15% | 1.03% | 0.62% | 0.90% | 1.37% | 1.51% | 1.41% | 1.55% | 1.57% |
TGRW T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, TGRW and SPYG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPYG has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to TGRW (6.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGRW dropped -43.33% vs SPYG's -67.63%.
On 5-year performance, SPYG leads with 14.11% vs 7.54% for TGRW. On fees, SPYG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, TGRW has been the lower-risk option at 6.40%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SPYG has performed better with a 14.11% return vs 7.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPYG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.52% for TGRW.
SPYG has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for TGRW.
TGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while SPYG is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for TGRW and 0.04% for SPYG.
SPYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGRW and SPYG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer