PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGB vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGB vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 18.44% return. Over the past 10 years, TGB has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 29.92%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.94% annualized return.


TGB

1D
3.14%
1M
-6.94%
YTD
16.08%
6M
16.49%
1Y
125.00%
3Y*
67.82%
5Y*
25.27%
10Y*
29.92%

SCHD

1D
0.76%
1M
-1.39%
YTD
18.44%
6M
17.45%
1Y
26.47%
3Y*
14.64%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
12.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGB vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited
16.08%191.75%38.57%-4.76%-28.29%55.30%175.00%1.48%-79.70%173.38%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
18.44%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TGB and SCHD is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011

0.33

The correlation between TGB and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGB vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGB
TGB Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGB vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGBSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.43

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.54

5.76

-2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

13.87

-4.81

TGB vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGB and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGB vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGBSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.58%

-33.37%

-65.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.47%

-4.61%

-30.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.26%

-16.13%

-28.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.92%

-16.85%

-45.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.76%

-33.37%

-57.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.22%

-1.87%

-50.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-81.32%

-3.31%

-78.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.86%

1.91%

+11.95%

Volatility

TGB vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a higher volatility of 24.25% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.12%. This indicates that TGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGBSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.25%

3.12%

+21.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.59%

7.74%

+44.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.91%

11.09%

+53.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.89%

14.36%

+48.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

65.88%

16.70%

+49.18%

Dividends

TGB vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

TGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.28%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%
TGB
Taseko Mines Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGB and SCHD have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGB has higher volatility (24.25%) compared to SCHD (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGB dropped -98.58% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGB and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer