TGB vs. SCHD

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TGB (Taseko Mines Limited) is a stock, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) is Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Over the past 10 years, TGB returned 31.03%/yr vs 12.80%/yr for SCHD. Their 0.32 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

TGB vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGB achieves a 38.34% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 25.44% return. Over the past 10 years, TGB has outperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 31.03%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively lower 12.80% annualized return.

TGB

• 1D: 12.34%
• 1M: 12.99%
• 6M: -11.33%
• YTD: 38.34%
• 1Y: 153.40%
• 3Y*: 78.36%
• 5Y*: 33.89%
• 10Y*: 31.03%
• ALL TIME*: -1.35%

SCHD

• 1D: 0.86%
• 1M: 4.51%
• 6M: 12.81%
• YTD: 25.44%
• 1Y: 31.88%
• 3Y*: 15.21%
• 5Y*: 9.72%
• 10Y*: 12.80%
• ALL TIME*: 13.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	$839.54M	$733.40M	$694.82M
TGB Taseko Mines Limited	$49.74M	$40.96M	$38.39M

TGB vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TGB Taseko Mines Limited	38.34%	191.75%	38.57%	-4.76%	-28.29%	55.30%	175.00%	1.48%	-79.70%	173.38%
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	25.44%	4.34%	11.66%	4.54%	-3.26%	29.87%	15.03%	27.29%	-5.56%	20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between TGB and SCHD is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.08
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.23
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.33
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2011	0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between TGB and SCHD has dropped to 0.08 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

TGB vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGB

TGB Risk / Return Rank: 90
TGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
TGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
TGB Omega Ratio Rank: 86
TGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
TGB Martin Ratio Rank: 91

SCHD

SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 95
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGB vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TGB	SCHD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	2.90	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	4.49	-1.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.52	-0.20
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.35	6.94	-2.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.39	17.52	-7.13

TGB vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGB Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGB and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TGB vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGB drawdown since its inception was -98.58%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGB and SCHD.

Drawdown Indicators

	TGB	SCHD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.58%	-33.37%	-65.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.47%	-4.61%	-30.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.26%	-16.13%	-28.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-61.92%	-16.85%	-45.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-90.76%	-33.37%	-57.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.05%	-0.12%	-42.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.21%	-3.29%	-77.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.82%	1.82%	+13.00%

Volatility

TGB vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

Taseko Mines Limited (TGB) has a higher volatility of 28.03% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.82%. This indicates that TGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TGB	SCHD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.03%	3.82%	+24.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.62%	8.01%	+47.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	68.69%	11.06%	+57.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.64%	14.38%	+49.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.24%	16.73%	+49.51%

Dividends

TGB vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

TGB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF	3.10%	3.82%	3.64%	3.49%	3.39%	2.78%	3.16%	2.98%	3.06%	2.63%	2.89%	2.97%
TGB Taseko Mines Limited	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TGB and SCHD in my portfolio?

TGB and SCHD have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TGB or SCHD?

TGB has higher volatility (28.03%) compared to SCHD (3.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGB dropped -98.58% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.